From richard@stars.gsfc.nasa.gov Tue Mar 18 11:06:10 2003 Received: from sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu (sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu [128.32.147.25]) by apollo.ssl.berkeley.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h2IJ69U13659 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from stars.gsfc.nasa.gov (stars.gsfc.nasa.gov [128.183.172.28]) by sunspot.ssl.berkeley.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id h2IJ68dB025204 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANTOR ([128.183.175.17]) by stars.gsfc.nasa.gov with SMTP for hhudson@ssl.berkeley.edu; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:06:08 -0500 Message-ID: <003a01c2ed81$6f3036b0$11afb780@code680.gsfc.nasa.gov> From: "Richard Schwartz" To: "Hugh Hudson" References: <200303181727.h2IHRFw00266@delsol.ssl.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: individual detectors Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:06:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Length: 1724 Status: R Hugh It's easy to get the average livetime weighted grid transmission. First get the roll period from an observing summary object: IDL> temp=obs->getdata(class='hsi_qlook_roll_period') IDL> roll=avg(temp.roll_period) IDL> print,roll 4.08838 Next, set the time_range in an imaging object to some integral number of roll periods for the appropriate obs_time_interval: IDL> im->set,time_range=[0,roll*10] Extract the calib_eventlist and compute: IDL> c=im->getdata(class='hsi_calib_eventlist') HSI_RD_RASPMT: 56 packets of PMTRAS data were found. PMTRAS_ANALYSIS: Blip intensity cutoff set to 94 PMTRAS_ANALYSIS: Compensating for P-angle = -12.083 degrees PMTRAS_ANALYSIS: 1667 points. Period= 4.088239 s 6 stars MAXrmsscatter= 0.032 degrees. IDL> IDL> for i=0,8 do print,avg( (*c[i]).gridtran) 0.174087 0.177655 0.122889 0.187994 0.165717 0.201592 0.223310 0.217403 0.218618 IDL> for i=0,8 do print,avg( (*c[i]).gridtran *(*c[i]).livetime) 0.170131 0.172686 0.119922 0.183611 0.161839 0.196923 0.218630 0.212284 0.213727 So you see there is a good explanatio for the smaller amplitude of 3. This is the first Van Beek grid and fov is a problem for finer grids of this design. Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugh Hudson" To: Cc: ; Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:27 PM Subject: Re: individual detectors > Hmmm, you're right about the slow modulation, I was not thinking about > that. We seem not to be limited very strongly by photon count in A0 > (surprise, surprise) so maybe the best bet is to stick with whichever > of G6, G8, or G9 have small slow modulation. > > More anon > > Hugh