Introduction
Solar X-ray jets (transient X-ray bursts in the form of collimated flows
of high-temperature plasma) were first observed by Yohkoh;
see any of several Yohkoh Science nuggets such as the one on the
triple jet.
Jets occur in regions of emerging magnetic field, X-ray bright points
and active regions, and it is supposed that magnetic reconnection
is responsible for the acceleration of particles and heating of the
plasma to temperatures of a few million degrees during these events.
The emerging-flux model
(Heyvaerts
-
Shibata) fits well.
It describes the interaction of emerging photospheric field with pre-existing
overlying coronal magnetic field.
As the new emerging flux rises, it is pushed up
against and reconnects with the overlying coronal magnetic field
lines, and the reconfiguration allows the the previously highly
stressed field lines of the emerging flux to act as a slingshot
as they straighten out, resulting in the ejection of plasma that
had been previously supported in the emerging flux tube.
At the same time the surrounding plasma is heated, and
this can be seen as the jet X-ray emission.
In the process we would expect the acceleration of
electrons, as in a solar flare, and indeed jet-related electrons
have been detected directly in space (see our
earlier Nugget)
as well as via the radio signatures (type III bursts).
Of course, as we know from these RHESSI Nuggets, the major diagnostic
of fast electrons is bremsstrahlung X-ray emission, but until now
we have never seen any evidence of hard X-ray emission directly from the jet
in the corona.
This could be because it is rare to find a coronal jet dense enough to
provide a bremsstrahlung target for the electrons, or hot enough
to generate high energy thermal emission.
In this Nugget we report
what we believe to be the first observation of hard X-ray emission
formed in a coronal jet.
Event overview
In this nugget we present a jet which occurred on the 22nd August
2002 preceding a
GOES M5.4 flare.
Its evolution was observed by a number of instruments.
In particular we concentrate on the pre-impulsive
and impulsive phases of the flare.
Figure 1 shows time profiles from GOES, RHESSI,
TRACE
and the
Nobeyama Radioheliograph (NoRH).
The dashed vertical lines on these plots show time intervals over
which RHESSI images were obtained.
Figure 1:
Lightcurves of various flare emissions.
Left, GOES soft X-rays and RHESSI hard/soft X-rays; right, TRACE EUV
and Nobeyama microwave data.
From the movie of TRACE 195 observations a series of collimated ejections can
be recognized.
TRACE images covering the main ejection of material can be seen in the
"confusogram" of Figure 2.
This diagram displays time slices top to bottom, and different RHESSI
energy ranges left to right.
At the time of the main ejection, ~01:50:30 (row 2), RHESSI
emission to as high as the 30-50 keV energy band can be seen in the
region of the ejected material.
This suggests the presence of nonthermal hard X-ray emission in the jet.
As the event continues, footpoints can be seen to form; we interpret
these in the standard model as resulting from the precipitation of
electrons accelerated in the corona and guided into the lower atmosphere
on newly-connected field lines.
RHESSI spectroscopy for this event shows temperatures of around 20MK,
with a power-law tail. Without imaging spectroscopy, it's not possible
to be sure how much the jet emission is contributing to the power law,
but there is strong evidence from radio (below) that non-thermal
electrons are present in the jet.
Figure 2:
A "confusogram" packed with information about the four time slices
(on rows) and four RHESSI energy ranges (on columns, with different
colors: 6-12, 12-20, 20-30, and 30-50 keV).
The rightmost column shows all RHESSI energies overlaid.
As seen in Figure 1, this event coincided with radio observations
from the
Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory in Japan.
This observatory makes images at 17 and 34 GHz that are
extremely useful for diagnosing the flaring plasma,
especially in conjunction with RHESSI.
At these frequencies we can assume that the microwave emission is
gyrosynchrotron radiation from particles at even higher energies than
those observed via RHESSI hard X-rays, and hence definitely non-thermal
in nature.
For the main time interval of interest (row 2 at 01:50:30 UT)
the radio images also show radio emission in the jetting region,
confirming the presence of non-thermal electrons.
Figure 3:
Left: Nobeyama 17 GHz and 34 GHz (black and blue) and RHESSI 30-50 keV
(red) contours overlaid on the TRACE image at Time Slice 2.
Note the extension of the blue (high-frequency radio) contours in the
direction of the jet.
Right: contour map of radio spectral index α, as described in the
text.
Figure 3 (left) shows the Nobeyama 17 GHz, 34 GHz and
RHESSI 30-50 keV contours overlaid on the corresponding TRACE image.
This suggests evidence of gyrosynchrotron emission hence supporting
the case for nonthermal particles present in the jet at this time.
From the flux at 17 GHz and 34 GHz it is possible to determine a
radio spectral index α from Fν ~ να.
Figure 3 (right) then shows a contour map of this spectral index
alpha
with contours of positive alpha, ranging from 0 to 1.5 in steps of
0.25, corresponding to an optically thin plasma in the jetting
region through which the fast moving electrons propagate.
As expected, type III radio bursts could be seen throughout this
interval (see, for example, this
RHESSI Browser
excerpt).
Conclusions
All of the evidence is consistent with the presence of non-thermal
electrons in the jet region just at the onset of the impulsive phase
of the flare.
The novelty of this event is the presence of a clear 30-50 keV hard
X-ray signature and its confirmation as non-thermal via the Nobeyama
spectral-index mapping.
Further work can be carried combining these observations by Nobeyama
and RHESSI to estimate the magnetic field strength and direction in the
jetting region.
The electron distribution of the energetic electrons producing
emission at these wavelengths can also be determined.
We note that observations of this type tend to be ambiguous and
model-dependent, and we hope that other examples will be found.
Biographical note:
Hazel Bain and Lyndsay Fletcher are graduate student and Reader,
respectively, at the University of Glasgow.