Birth of a dense flaring loop
From RHESSI Wiki
|1st Author:||Laura Bone|
|Published:||27 January 2006|
|Next Nugget:||Three is company|
|Previous Nugget:||Time delay between HXR and Gamma-rays|
In the classical "thick target" model of a solar flare, high-energy electrons are accelerated at some reconnection site in the corona. The electrons stream down the magnetic field lines to the chromosphere where they are stopped by the dense plasma and produce hard X-ray emission by collisional bremsstrahlung. The plasma at the footpoints then heats up, and "evaporates" into the coronal magnetic loop, producing thermal soft X-ray emission.
From the early 1970's hard X-ray emission has occasionally been seen in the corona as well, initially in occulted events (flares with the footpoints behind the limb). These first events were interpreted to be thermal bremsstrahlung from hot coronal plasma, with significant thick target emission only at the footpoints. The first observation of an impulsive, and by implication non-thermal coronal source, was the famous Masuda flare. Later Yohkoh studies of X-ray flares demonstrated that coronal sources exhibit both gradual and impulsive hard X-ray emission.
Since its launch in 2002 RHESSI, has observed a number of both moving and stationary coronal sources. The frequency of these sources and the diversity of the physics they show us has been one of the major developments of the RHESSI era. Theoretically one of the simplest explanations for coronal sources, particularly in flares with little or no footpoint emission, is an enhanced coronal density, but then we must explain how the density came to be so large in the first place. We must also ask whether these dense regions can be observed in other ways, e.g. via the techniques of solar radio astronomy.
We have studied a flare in which RHESSI observes emission up to 50 keV, definitely in the "hard" or "non-thermal" energy range. This unocculted M3.7 flare, on the April 14, 2002 00:05 , showed hard X-ray emission primarily from the corona, with little or no footpoint emission during most of the event (see Figure 1). This was interpreted in terms of high coronal column densities: electrons up to ~50 keV actually stopped high up in the corona, in effect producing a coronal thick target.
At the onset of this event emission measures derived from the GOES soft X-ray data suggested that the column density was already rather high, ~1020cm-2, implying that the loop was already filled with plasma. For this flare complementary multi-wavelength observations provided us with information allowing us to understand the active region evolution and sequence of events in which the dense loop was born. Two flares occurred in this active region in close temporal and spatial proximity and this sequence of flares leads us to propose a series of reconnections between multiple loops in a 3-dimensional field geometry.
Model of the loop interaction
The loop in which the M3.7 flare occurs can be seen to brighten gradually both in EIT 195 Å and 17 GHz (radio microwave band) just after the impulsive phase of the earlier flare. Combined with the already bright, polarised radio emission from the southern footpoint, this is evidence that fast electrons may already have been present in the flaring loop (see Figure 2).
The earlier flare occurs at the interface of two active regions through reconnection it forms a small dense loop between the two active regions and an area of overlying field. The small loop, observed to be initially rather dense, becomes unstable; this leads to further particle acceleration and density increase and the rise of the loop which interacts with the overlying field (see Figure 3).
We estimate that a column density of up to 2×1020 cm-2 could have been evaporated during the initial flare. If only a fraction of this plasma is transferred onto the small dense loop, then the this may account for the already-high column density at the onset of the second flare.
We propose that plasma evaporated in an earlier flare may account for the already high plasma density at the onset of a second flare. The usual two-dimensional flare model runs into some trouble here as within this framework the electrons accelerated in the later flare would have almost no access to the dense loop created by an earlier event. However using multiwavelength observations to build up a three-dimensional picture of the magnetic configuration in which the flares occur, we see that reconnection may produce a short sheared loop onto which plasma evaporates. This loop then becomes unstable, allowing a second flare in which the density increases further and few accelerated electrons reach the footpoints.
Biographical note: Laura Bone is a PhD student at the University of Glasgow. This work was carried out in collaboration with John Brown, Lyndsay Fletcher, Astrid Veronig and Stephen White.