Tohban Report 2015-03-18
From RHESSI Wiki
|Start Date:||11 Mar 2015|
|End Date:||18 Mar 2015|
|Tohban:||Juan C. Martinez Oliveros|
|Next Tohban:||Jim McTiernan|
|List all reports|
Solar activity was very active this week. There are currently 5 ARs on the disk with the probability of more M and C class flares in the following days. Active regions are 12297 and 12302 were the most active.
How many GOES flares occurred?
Flares above B, C, M, X class were 10 57 15 1
And how many of these are listed in the RHESSI flare list?
Flares above B, C, M, X class were 5 31 9 1
And how many had EXCELLENT coverage?
Flares above B, C, M, X class were 4 17 3 0
There were RHESSI flares/GOES flares 349 / 83 over the time range 11-Mar-15 18-Mar-15
The SSR fill level reached a maximum of 32% and a minimum of about 8% during the week.
The cold plate 1 and 2 are at about 108.7 K and 106.9 K respectively.
No data gaps this week
On March 11 2015 the threshold on detector 9 rear fast was changed from 0x80 to 0x90.
2015-070-22:46:04 /IDPUTABLE9 OFFSET=REARFASTDAC 2015-070-22:46:19 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0x90
The fast rear threshold of detectors 6,8,9 and the fast front threshold of detector 6 were increased by 16 steps on 13 March 2015.
15-072-22:04:01 /IDPUTABLE6 OFFSET=FRONTFASTDAC 15-072-22:04:22 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0x60
15-072-22:05:07 /IDPUTABLE6 OFFSET=REARFASTDAC 15-072-22:05:17 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0x60
15-072-22:05:41 /IDPUTABLE8 OFFSET=REARFASTDAC 15-072-22:05:56 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0x55
15-072-22:06:18 /IDPUTABLE9 OFFSET=REARFASTDAC 15-072-22:06:31 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0xA0
On 16 March 2015 detector 9's Rear Fast threshold was increased by 16 steps to 0xB0.
15-075-19:24:13 /IDPUTABLE9 OFFSET=REARFASTDAC 15-075-19:24:28 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0xB0
Detector 6 Front Fast threshold was increased by 16 counts, from 0x60 to 0x70 on 17 March 2015.
15-076-20:44:01 /IDPUTABLE6 OFFSET=FRONTFASTDAC 15-076-20:44:14 /IDPLOAD VALUE=0x70
|Night time data (fronts)||plus/minus 4 minutes only|
|Night time data (rears)||plus/minus 4 minutes only|
|Require extra passes?||No|
|Requirement for moving pointer?||No|