Collapsing Traps

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Section I drafted)
(Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration: Drafted)
Line 23: Line 23:
==Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration==
==Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration==
 +
 +
A collapsing trap actually may accelerate particles in two distinct ways: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betatron "betatron"]] and first-order [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_acceleration Fermi acceleration]].
 +
These result respectively from diminishing diameter of the collapsing flux tube, and from its decreasing length.
 +
The latter is easier to understand - as the trap shortens, the two reflective mirrors apparently ''approach'' one another.
 +
The motion of the mirror means that the reflected particle gains energy.
 +
To understand the betatron process one has to follow the basic physics of adiabatic particle motion; essentially the particle energy must increase as the magnitude of '''B''' increases during the collapse.
 +
 +
[[Image:simple_trap.jpg|350px|thumb|right| Simplification of the collapsing trap to show the two processes at work. Contraction of the trap in length causes Fermi acceleration, and contraction perpendicular to '''B''' causes betatron acceleration.]]
 +
 +
This rough description omits a great deal of complexity.
 +
Even though the basic physics is straightforward, and has been known for many decades, the application to an astrophysical situation requires that we know what particles are there, how the flows in the plasma proceed, and other somewhat intangible details involving wave-particle interactions.
 +
To assess these complicated issues in a satisfactory manner really requires model-building, using realistic parameters taken from the observations as a guide.
==Some Data==
==Some Data==
==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==

Revision as of 17:17, 18 January 2009


Nugget
Number: 94
1st Author: Boris Somov
2nd Author: Hugh Hudson
Published: 19 January 2009
Next Nugget: A Quantum of Solar
Previous Nugget: RHESSI_Simulations_of_Complicated_Flares
List all



Contents

Introduction

The coronal magnetic field can undergo large-scale restructurings during a flare or CME. If this restructuring happens [adiabatically], i.e. on scales large compared with the [Larmor motion] of the particles in question, they can gain or lose energy. A "collapsing trap" is exactly the sort of geometry expected from large-scale magnetic reconnection, and so this concept provides a basic mechanism for particle acceleration in a flare or CME. The sketches in Figure 1 show how this might work. There is a lot more detail than needed in the sketches; basically on the left one sees a reconnected magnetic field line "dipolarizing" rapidly, and on the left slowly. This process is the basic element of the standard reconnection models of solar flares, as explained copiously elsewhere among the Nuggets (for example, [here].

Two views of the collapsing magnetic trap following large-scale reconnection. The longer arrows show the field deforming, so rapidly on the left as to induce a fast-mode shock wave ("SW") and more slowly on the right.

Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration

A collapsing trap actually may accelerate particles in two distinct ways: ["betatron"] and first-order [Fermi acceleration]. These result respectively from diminishing diameter of the collapsing flux tube, and from its decreasing length. The latter is easier to understand - as the trap shortens, the two reflective mirrors apparently approach one another. The motion of the mirror means that the reflected particle gains energy. To understand the betatron process one has to follow the basic physics of adiabatic particle motion; essentially the particle energy must increase as the magnitude of B increases during the collapse.

Simplification of the collapsing trap to show the two processes at work. Contraction of the trap in length causes Fermi acceleration, and contraction perpendicular to B causes betatron acceleration.

This rough description omits a great deal of complexity. Even though the basic physics is straightforward, and has been known for many decades, the application to an astrophysical situation requires that we know what particles are there, how the flows in the plasma proceed, and other somewhat intangible details involving wave-particle interactions. To assess these complicated issues in a satisfactory manner really requires model-building, using realistic parameters taken from the observations as a guide.

Some Data

Conclusion

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox