Other Discoveries from Carrington's Flare

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
|second_author =  
|second_author =  
|publish_date = 2 February 2009
|publish_date = 2 February 2009
-
|next_nugget = [[TBD]]
+
|next_nugget={{#ask: [[Category:Nugget]] [[RHESSI Nugget Index::95]]}}
-
|previous_nugget = [[Collapsing_traps]]
+
|previous_nugget={{#ask: [[Category:Nugget]] [[RHESSI Nugget Index::93]]}}
}}
}}
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
-
This is the [http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/%7Eiain/flares150/ sesquicentennial] of Richard Carrington's solar flare of 1859.  
+
This year is the [http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/%7Eiain/flares150/ sesquicentennial] of Richard Carrington's solar flare of 1859.  
-
He saw it in "white light" (ordinary visible continuum) as he was measuring sunspots, and the sketch he made (Figure 1) is often displayed.
+
He observed it in visible light ("white light") as he was measuring sunspots, and the sketch he made (Figure 1) is often displayed.
-
The idea that small parts of the very bright solar atmosphere could ''double'' in intensity in a such a short time must have astonished the observers: not only Carrington himself but also his assistant, plus an entirely independent observer named Richard Hodgson.
+
The idea that small parts of the very bright Sun could ''double'' in intensity in a such a short time must have astonished the observers: not only Carrington himself but also his assistant, plus an entirely independent observer named Richard Hodgson.
Detailed research has shown that this latter observer was not a weakish speller who might have been related to the author of this RHESSI Science Nugget.
Detailed research has shown that this latter observer was not a weakish speller who might have been related to the author of this RHESSI Science Nugget.
In Figure 1, at the state of the art of scientific graphics in 1859,  the letters A, B, C, and D point to the flare brightenings.
In Figure 1, at the state of the art of scientific graphics in 1859,  the letters A, B, C, and D point to the flare brightenings.
Line 21: Line 21:
This Nugget is not about the flare in (or near) the photosphere itself, but about its effects on Earth.
This Nugget is not about the flare in (or near) the photosphere itself, but about its effects on Earth.
It was not really Carrington's work (see below) but he nevertheless thought it important to report the association between the flare and its terrestrial effects.
It was not really Carrington's work (see below) but he nevertheless thought it important to report the association between the flare and its terrestrial effects.
-
It was in fact a phenomenally important association, which he famously described in the best British style of understatement as "One swallow does not make a summer."
+
It was in fact a phenomenally important association which he described in the best British style of understatement "While the contemporary occurrence may deserve noting, he would not have it supposed that he even leans towards hastily connecting them." "One swallow does not make a summer."
[[Image:carrington.jpg|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 1''': The Carrington white-light sketch. The emissions were very bright, of a color resembling Alpha Lyrae, and rapidly variable ("mortifying" in his description). These properties have been confirmed by subsequent observations of similar events.]]
[[Image:carrington.jpg|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 1''': The Carrington white-light sketch. The emissions were very bright, of a color resembling Alpha Lyrae, and rapidly variable ("mortifying" in his description). These properties have been confirmed by subsequent observations of similar events.]]
Line 28: Line 28:
When the flare happened, the recording magnetograph at [http://books.google.com/books?id=K6cOAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA37 Kew Gardens observatory] was in operation.
When the flare happened, the recording magnetograph at [http://books.google.com/books?id=K6cOAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA37 Kew Gardens observatory] was in operation.
-
It was known that a sensitive compass (magnetometer) could see all manner of variations at a low level.
+
It was known that a sensitive compass (magnetometer) could see all manner of variations at a low levels.
In fact, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Stewart Balfour Stewart], the director at Kew Observatory, independently noted many flare-induced disturbances during the disk passage of the sunspot group responsible for the Carrington flare (about two weeks).
In fact, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Stewart Balfour Stewart], the director at Kew Observatory, independently noted many flare-induced disturbances during the disk passage of the sunspot group responsible for the Carrington flare (about two weeks).
The polymath [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss Gauss] had already established that these variations were external perturbations of the geomagnetic field, which in the bulk had its origins (we know now) deep in the iron-nickel core of the Earth.
The polymath [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss Gauss] had already established that these variations were external perturbations of the geomagnetic field, which in the bulk had its origins (we know now) deep in the iron-nickel core of the Earth.
Line 36: Line 36:
[[Image:kew.jpg|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 2''': The compass records from Kew Gardens.]]
[[Image:kew.jpg|500px|thumb|center|'''Figure 2''': The compass records from Kew Gardens.]]
-
One of the main purposes of this Nugget is just to circulate Figure 2, which is not as well-known as Carrington's sketch. However it contains a lot of discovery. We now know there ''is'' an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere ionosphere]. Solar soft X-radiation increases the ionization level, and naturally occurring EMF's drive enhanced currents, which in turn deflect compass needles.  
+
One of the main purposes of this Nugget is to circulate Figure 2, which is not as well known as Carrington's sketch though it contains a lot of discovery. We now know there ''is'' an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionosphere ionosphere]. Solar soft X-radiation increases the ionization level, and naturally occurring EMF's drive enhanced currents, which in turn deflect compass needles.  
This is an example of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudden_ionospheric_disturbance Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance], or SID.
This is an example of a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudden_ionospheric_disturbance Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance], or SID.
-
There are many other different ionospheric effects resulting from different solar emissions and ionospheric properties, and prior to the era of space research these ionospheric effects provided as many clues to flare physics.
+
There are many other different ionospheric effects resulting from different solar emissions and ionospheric properties, and prior to the era of space research these ionospheric effects provided many clues to flare physics.
-
This is the beginning of [http://www.spaceweather.com/ "'''space weather'''"].
+
Carrington's tentative association is the beginning of [http://www.spaceweather.com/ "'''space weather'''"].
-
The initial compass perturbation is due to ionization produced by photons, traveling from the Sun at the speed of light - a few minutes' delay.
+
The initial compass perturbation is due to ionization at the top of Earth's atmosphere produced by high-energy photons, which travel from the Sun at the speed of light - a few minutes' delay.
The later [http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wmagstrm.html magnetic storm] is due to solar plasma ejected by the flare (a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_mass_ejection Coronal Mass Ejection]).
The later [http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/wmagstrm.html magnetic storm] is due to solar plasma ejected by the flare (a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_mass_ejection Coronal Mass Ejection]).
The plasma moves one [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_unit A.U.] in about 17 hours.  
The plasma moves one [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_unit A.U.] in about 17 hours.  
Line 53: Line 53:
There are still mysteries associated with these powerful phenomena, possibly involving gamma-rays from pion decay, sunquakes, or other exotica.
There are still mysteries associated with these powerful phenomena, possibly involving gamma-rays from pion decay, sunquakes, or other exotica.
Probably the ionosphere is too crude a detector to be of much use any longer, but we should not forget its great contributions over the fifteen decades since Carrington's time!
Probably the ionosphere is too crude a detector to be of much use any longer, but we should not forget its great contributions over the fifteen decades since Carrington's time!
 +
 +
==References==
 +
* [http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/full/seri/MNRAS/0020//0000013.000.html Description of a Singular Appearance Seen In the Sun on September 1st, 1859] by R.C. Carrington Esq.
 +
* [http://www.stuartclark.com/sunkings.html Stuart Clark], ''The Sun Kings:The Unexpected Tragedy of Richard Carrington and the Tale of How Modern Astronomy Began'', Princeton U. Press (2007).
 +
* [http://www.springerlink.com/content/wv2666w3hgu7qm07/ The 1859 Solar–Terrestrial Disturbance And the Current Limits of Extreme Space Weather Activity"] E.A. Cliver and L. Svalgaard, Solar Phys. 224, 407 (2005).
 +
 +
[[Category:Nugget]]

Latest revision as of 16:29, 22 August 2018


Nugget
Number: 94
1st Author: Hugh Hudson
2nd Author:
Published: 2 February 2009
Next Nugget: Coronal implosion
Previous Nugget: Collapsing Traps, RHESSI Simulations of Complicated Flares
List all



Contents

Introduction

This year is the sesquicentennial of Richard Carrington's solar flare of 1859. He observed it in visible light ("white light") as he was measuring sunspots, and the sketch he made (Figure 1) is often displayed. The idea that small parts of the very bright Sun could double in intensity in a such a short time must have astonished the observers: not only Carrington himself but also his assistant, plus an entirely independent observer named Richard Hodgson. Detailed research has shown that this latter observer was not a weakish speller who might have been related to the author of this RHESSI Science Nugget. In Figure 1, at the state of the art of scientific graphics in 1859, the letters A, B, C, and D point to the flare brightenings. The spot umbrae and penumbrae appear somewhat stylized, but Carrington was notoriously correct in his observational work and analyses of it.

This Nugget is not about the flare in (or near) the photosphere itself, but about its effects on Earth. It was not really Carrington's work (see below) but he nevertheless thought it important to report the association between the flare and its terrestrial effects. It was in fact a phenomenally important association which he described in the best British style of understatement "While the contemporary occurrence may deserve noting, he would not have it supposed that he even leans towards hastily connecting them." "One swallow does not make a summer."

Figure 1: The Carrington white-light sketch. The emissions were very bright, of a color resembling Alpha Lyrae, and rapidly variable ("mortifying" in his description). These properties have been confirmed by subsequent observations of similar events.

The other 1859 observation

When the flare happened, the recording magnetograph at Kew Gardens observatory was in operation. It was known that a sensitive compass (magnetometer) could see all manner of variations at a low levels. In fact, Balfour Stewart, the director at Kew Observatory, independently noted many flare-induced disturbances during the disk passage of the sunspot group responsible for the Carrington flare (about two weeks). The polymath Gauss had already established that these variations were external perturbations of the geomagnetic field, which in the bulk had its origins (we know now) deep in the iron-nickel core of the Earth. The Carrington flare now strongly suggested that some of these variations could ultimately be traced to the Sun, rather than to near-Earth space, and the Kew observation shown below (Figure 2) shows that these could be prompt. It was correctly argued by Kelvin that these perturbations could not result directly from changes of solar magnetism, but nobody at the time had the imagination to anticipate X rays or the ionosphere, both key ingredients to an explanation of Figure 2.

Figure 2: The compass records from Kew Gardens.

One of the main purposes of this Nugget is to circulate Figure 2, which is not as well known as Carrington's sketch though it contains a lot of discovery. We now know there is an ionosphere. Solar soft X-radiation increases the ionization level, and naturally occurring EMF's drive enhanced currents, which in turn deflect compass needles. This is an example of a Sudden Ionospheric Disturbance, or SID. There are many other different ionospheric effects resulting from different solar emissions and ionospheric properties, and prior to the era of space research these ionospheric effects provided many clues to flare physics.

Carrington's tentative association is the beginning of "space weather". The initial compass perturbation is due to ionization at the top of Earth's atmosphere produced by high-energy photons, which travel from the Sun at the speed of light - a few minutes' delay. The later magnetic storm is due to solar plasma ejected by the flare (a Coronal Mass Ejection). The plasma moves one A.U. in about 17 hours. This means a speed of some 2500 km/s, nearly 0.01 c, which is at the high end of speeds of solar ejecta. This high speed befits such a powerful flare event. The compass deflections during the main magnetic storm result from other current systems, driven not by the regular diurnal effects of the steady solar wind, but by the stresses of the CME itself.

Conclusion

The white-light flare phenomenon, of which Carrington's 1859 event was the first recorded, is something that RHESSI can study important aspects of, namely the hard X-ray emission that we have discussed in earlier Nuggets (11, 76, 92). There are still mysteries associated with these powerful phenomena, possibly involving gamma-rays from pion decay, sunquakes, or other exotica. Probably the ionosphere is too crude a detector to be of much use any longer, but we should not forget its great contributions over the fifteen decades since Carrington's time!

References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox