Photospheric Electric Fields and Energy Fluxes in the Eruptive Active Region NOAA 11158

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 22: Line 22:
Pre- and post-flare snapshots of the vertical magnetic field (Figure 2) show that the horizontal magnetic field close to PIL increased by over 300 G during the X2.2 flare (see arrows), while the vertical magnetic field remained nearly constant, consistent with the field implosion scenario. On the difference image (right panel) we also notice two circular patterns, directed counter-clockwise in negative and clockwise in positive polarities, implying that the field connecting those polarities becomes less twisted.
Pre- and post-flare snapshots of the vertical magnetic field (Figure 2) show that the horizontal magnetic field close to PIL increased by over 300 G during the X2.2 flare (see arrows), while the vertical magnetic field remained nearly constant, consistent with the field implosion scenario. On the difference image (right panel) we also notice two circular patterns, directed counter-clockwise in negative and clockwise in positive polarities, implying that the field connecting those polarities becomes less twisted.
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[File:Fig07 bz zoom.png|800px|thumb|left|Figure 1: (A)–(D): HMI vertical magnetic field (Bz) maps at four different times of NOAA 11158 evolution. Panel (E):  positive/negative vertical magnetic fluxes during the 6-day interval. Diamonds indicate the times of images on the left. An X2.2 flare is marked with the dashed line. ]]

Revision as of 21:39, 9 September 2015

Contents

Introduction

The advent of high-cadence vector magnetic field and Doppler velocity measurements from e.g. HMI/SDO, SOT/Hinode and SOLIS, have made the estimation of electric fields in the solar photosphere possible. The calculation of the electric field from magnetic and Doppler data is critically important for various quantitative studies of the solar atmosphere. First, if we know both electric and magnetic field vectors in the photosphere, we can estimate both the Poynting flux of magnetic energy and the flux of relative magnetic helicity entering the corona. Second, knowledge of electric and magnetic fields enables the driving of time-dependent simulations of the coronal magnetic field. This is the goal of the Coronal Global Evolutionary Model (CGEM, Fisher et al. 2015).

Method

We have recently improved the electric field inversion methods introduced by Fisher et al. (2010), to create a comprehensive technique for calculating photospheric electric fields from vector magnetogram sequences (Kazachenko et al. 2014). The new method, which we dubbed the PDFI (an abbreviation for PTD-Doppler-FLCT-Ideal technique, where PTD and FLCT stand for Poloidal-Toroidal Decomposition and Fourier Local Correlation Tracking), has been systematically tested for accuracy and robustness, using synthetic data from ANMHD simulations. Here we take the next step forward, and apply the PDFI technique to observations.

Dataset

The flare-productive active region (AR) NOAA 11158 was observed by HMI nearly continuously for a six-day period over 2011 February 10–16 from its emergence (see Bz-snapshots in Figure 1). We used the sequence of 770 vector magnetic field B and Doppler field measurements to derive the temporal evolution of electric fields E and Poynting S fluxes during these six days.

Figure 1: (A)–(D): HMI vertical magnetic field (Bz) maps at four different times of NOAA 11158 evolution. Panel (E): positive/negative vertical magnetic fluxes during the 6-day interval. Diamonds indicate the times of images on the left. An X2.2 flare is marked with the dashed line.


Results

To describe the photospheric electric fields E and energy fluxes S in NOAA 11158, we use two approaches: we first show the spatial distribution of B, E and S at two times, before and after the X2.2 flare; we then analyze their temporal spatially integrated evolution over six days of observations.


Magnetic Field: Bpreflare and Bpostflare

Pre- and post-flare snapshots of the vertical magnetic field (Figure 2) show that the horizontal magnetic field close to PIL increased by over 300 G during the X2.2 flare (see arrows), while the vertical magnetic field remained nearly constant, consistent with the field implosion scenario. On the difference image (right panel) we also notice two circular patterns, directed counter-clockwise in negative and clockwise in positive polarities, implying that the field connecting those polarities becomes less twisted.


Figure 1: (A)–(D): HMI vertical magnetic field (Bz) maps at four different times of NOAA 11158 evolution. Panel (E): positive/negative vertical magnetic fluxes during the 6-day interval. Diamonds indicate the times of images on the left. An X2.2 flare is marked with the dashed line.
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox