SEPs Link not Confirmed

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(updated infobox and changed category)
Line 4: Line 4:
|number = 83
|number = 83
|first_author = Gerry Share
|first_author = Gerry Share
-
|second_author =  
+
|second_author = Allan Tylka
-
|publish_date = 10 October 2008
+
|publish_date = 29 October 2008
|next_nugget = [[RHESSI Optical Images]]
|next_nugget = [[RHESSI Optical Images]]
|previous_nugget = [[RHESSI Optical Images]]
|previous_nugget = [[RHESSI Optical Images]]
Line 12: Line 12:
==Introduction==
==Introduction==
 
 
-
Solar and space scientists have endeavored for years to predict the occurrence of solar energetic particle (SEP) events. These events have the potential for damaging satellite electronics and providing significant radiation doses to astronauts in space. In Nugget 46 entitled “Soft-Hard-Harder” Sam Krucker and Hugh Hudson describe RHESSI observations of five solar flares that occurred in 2005 January. These observations appear to confirm an earlier study done by Alan Kiplinger using Solar Maximum Mission (SMM HXRBS) data from the 1980’s indicating that soft-hard-hard spectral evolution in hard X-ray bursts and soft-hard-harder evolution throughout a flare are indicators of an ensuing SEP event. Both studies have also been published in the Astrophysical Journal. It is important to note that the definition of this spectral hardening is somewhat vague and the analyses have been subjective. If one can find flares associated with SEP events that have no soft-hard-hard characteristics of any kind then the premise can be ruled out.
+
Solar and space scientists have endeavored for years to predict the occurrence of solar energetic particle (SEP) events. These events have the potential for damaging satellite electronics and providing significant radiation doses to astronauts in space. In Nugget 46 entitled “Soft-Hard-Harder” Sam Krucker and Hugh Hudson describe RHESSI observations of five solar flares that occurred in 2005 January. These observations appear to confirm an earlier study done by Alan Kiplinger using Solar Maximum Mission (SMM HXRBS) data from the 1980’s indicating that soft-hard-harder (SHH) spectral evolution “either over flux peaks or during flux decays” are indicators of an ensuing SEP event. Both studies have also been published in the Astrophysical Journal. It is important to note that the definition of this spectral hardening is somewhat vague and the analyses can be subjective. If one can find SEP events in which the associated flares have no soft-hard-harder characteristics, then the premise can be ruled out.
-
 
+
-
In this Nugget, we discuss hard X-ray observations of six solar flares between 1991 and 2001 made by Yohkoh that were accompanied by SEP events. We find no evidence for Soft-Hard-Hard evolution in these flares even though four of the SEP events had intensities of >400 MeV protons, sufficiently high to be detected at ground level on Earth (by neutron monitors). A similar conclusion was reached in a Yohkoh Nugget (2001 August 17) by Nariaki Nitta based on much more limited analysis.
+
-
==Observations==
+
In this Nugget, we discuss hard X-ray observations of five solar flares between 1998 and 2003 made by Yohkoh and RHESSI that were accompanied by SEP events. In two of the flares we observe progressive spectral hardening, which may be interpreted as SHH evolution in an X-ray peak. We cannot find evidence for SHH spectral evolution in the other flares even though they were associated with SEP having intensities in >400 MeV protons sufficiently high to be detected at ground level on Earth (by neutron monitors).  
-
 
+
-
The Yohkoh hard X-ray spectrometer (HXS) consisted of a 7.6 cm (diam) by 2.5 cm (thick) NaI scintillator coupled to a photomultiplier tube. It covered the energy range for ~35 keV to 800 keV that varied over the mission. Incident X-ray photons create energetic electrons in NaI that produce light pulses proportional to the amount of energy that they lose. A spectrum of the incident X-ray flux can then be created.
+
-
 
+
-
In order to search for spectral hardening signature we accumulated data at 1 sec temporal resolution in two energy ranges ~50-100 keV and ~100 – 200 keV. In doing this we corrected for gain variations during the mission. We subtracted the background using data taken just before and after the flare, where possible. For all these flares we plot the number of counts/sec observed in the ~100 – 200 keV range in the top panel and the 100-200 keV/50-100 keV count ratio in the bottom panel. Thus harder spectra will have larger ratios.
+
-
 
+
-
1991 October 27 flare
+
-
This flare occurred in an active region at 15E and produced what was listed as an SEP event although the particles that were observed came from an ESP event associated with a local shock. The Yohkoh data at this point in the mission was rather sparse; we therefore obtained backgrounds about 25 hours earlier. There were several peaks in the flare that all appear to follow a soft-hard-soft evolution.
 
-
 
 
-
1997 November 6 Flare
 
-
 
 
-
This flare occurred near W63 and produced a large SEP/GLE with a likely particle injection time no earlier than 12:10 UT. The hardness ratio does not follow the peaks in the hard x-ray range closely but there is no clear evidence for soft-hard-hard evolution. In
 
-
1998 May 6 Solar Flare
+
==Method==
 
 
-
The flare came from an active region at ~W63 and the GLE was relatively weak. The peak flux was about 25 times weaker than the 1997 Nov. 6 flare. The spectrum is considerably softer than that found for the 1997 Nov. 6 flare. The flux in many parts of the flare is close to background leading to large uncertainties in the hardness ratio. There is hardening through the second peak but it softens on the trailing edge. The particle injection likely occurred between 8 hr 9min and 8 hr 12 min, after the second peak.
+
The Yohkoh hard X-ray spectrometer (HXS) consisted of a 7.6 cm (diam) by 2.5 cm (thick) NaI scintillator coupled to a photomultiplier tube. It covered the energy range for ~35 keV to 800 keV that varied over the mission. Incident X-ray photons create energetic electrons in NaI that produce light pulses proportional to the amount of energy that they lose.   A spectrum of the incident X-ray flux can then be created. We use the front detectors in analysis of the two RHESSI flares.
-
2000 July 14 Solar Flare
+
In order to search for spectral hardening signature we accumulated data in two energy ranges ~50-100 keV and ~100 – 200 keV. In doing this we corrected for gain variations during the Yohkoh HXS mission. We subtracted the background using data taken just before and after the flare, where possible. We determined the RHESSI background using data accumulated under the same environmental conditions 15 orbits earlier and/or later.
-
 
+
-
The flare arose from an active region at W 07 and produced a large GLE. The peak flux was about a factor of two below that observed in the 2000 July 14 flare. The overall spectrum appears relatively soft. All of the spectral evolution appears to be of the soft-hard-soft variety. A study of this flare has already been published and this lack of a soft-hard-hard evolution was noted. The particle injection appeared to occur between 10:18 and 10:24 during the early phase of the observations.  
+
-
2000 November 24 Solar Flare
+
For all five flares we plot the number of counts/time interval observed in the ~100 – 200 keV range in the top panel and the ~100-200 keV/~50-100 keV count ratio (hardness ratio) in the bottom panel.  Thus harder spectra will have larger ratios.
-
 
+
 
-
The flare occurred in an active region at W5 and was observed as an SEP but not a GLE. Its peak hard X-ray intensity was as strong as that observed in the 1997 November 6 flare but it was softer. Only soft-hard-soft spectral evolution appears to have been observed.
+
==Two Flares Appearing to Exhibit SHH Behavior== 
 +
 
 +
The 1998 May 6 solar flare observed by Yohkoh occurred at ~W63.  The accompanied ground level event (GLE) for this flare was one of the weakest observed to date. The hard x-ray emission occurred primarily in two peaks.  In Figure 1 we plot the 100 – 200 keV rates for the second peak in the top panel and the ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio in the bottom panel.  The hard X-ray spectrum appears to harden through the second peak and into its decay phase before it softens at the trailing edge. 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Figure 1.  ~100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio (bottom panel) for the second peak of the 1998 May 6 solar flare.
 +
 
 +
The 2002 April 21 flare observed by RHESSI occurred at W84 and was accompanied by a solar energetic particle (SEP) that was too soft to be detected at ground level.  The X-ray emission came in two peaks.  The first one showed no clear spectral evolution but the second one exhibited SHH behavior from onset to the falling edge of the burst, as can be seen in Figure 2.
 +
 
 +
Figure 2.  100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and 100 – 200 keV/50 – 100 keV hardness ratio (bottom panel) for the second peak of the 2002 April 21 solar flare
 +
 
 +
 
 +
=Three Solar Flares with No Apparent SHH Spectral Evolution==
 +
 
 +
The 2000 July 14 ‘Bastille Day solar flare observed by Yohkoh occurred at W07 and gave rise to one of the largest SEP events ever observed.  It was also observed at ground level.  All of the spectral evolution appears to be of the soft-hard-soft variety as can be seen in Figure 3.  A study of this flare has already been published and this lack of a soft-hard-hard evolution was noted.  This flare was also the subject of a Yohkoh Nugget (author Hugh Hudson) in June 2001 that also found only SHS evolution based on observations with the HXT experiment on Yohkoh.
 +
 
 +
Figure 3.  ~100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio (bottom panel) for the 2000 July 14 solar flare.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The 2001 April 15 flare observed by Yohkoh occurred at W85.  It was associated with one of the largest GLEs seen in Cycle 23..  Once again only soft-hard-soft evolution appears to have been observed as can be seen in Figure 4
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Figure 4.  ~100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio for the 2001 April 15 solar flare.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The 2003 November 2 flare observed by RHESSI occurred at W56 and was also associated with a GLE.  The X-ray time history and hardness ratio are plotted in Figure 5.  Once again there is no clear evidence for SHH spectral evolution.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Figure 5.  100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and 100 – 200 keV/50 – 100 keV hardness ratio for the 2003 November 02 solar flare.
-
2001 April 15 Flare
 
-
 
 
-
The flare occurred at W85. The peak hard X-ray flux was about the same as observed from the 2000 July 14 flare. Only soft-hard-soft evolution appears to have been observed. Particle injection is likely to have occurred between 13:50 and 13:56, i.e. late in the flare.
 
==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==
 
 
-
The Yohkoh HXS detector observed six gamma-ray line flares associated with SEP and GLE events. We cannot find any evidence for the soft-hard-hard spectral evolution between 50 and 200 keV that has been suggested in flares associated with SEP events. Thus soft-hard-hard spectral evolution is not a necessary condition for production of an SEP event and is not an appropriate predictor for such events.
+
Based on our inspection of five solar flares, all associated with SEP events we find two (one observed by Yohkoh and one by RHESSI) that may be interpreted as soft-hard-harder (SHH) spectral evolution.  However, the remaining three flares (two observed by Yohkoh and one observed by RHESSI) only appear to exhibit SHS spectral evolution, at least to our ‘untrained eyes’ (we welcome a dialog on this subject). Thus soft-hard-hard (SHH) spectral evolution is not a necessary condition for production of an SEP event and is not an appropriate predictor for such events.
[[Category:Nugget Temp]]
[[Category:Nugget Temp]]

Revision as of 19:09, 30 October 2008


Nugget
Number: 83
1st Author: Gerry Share
2nd Author: Allan Tylka
Published: 29 October 2008
Next Nugget: RHESSI Optical Images
Previous Nugget: RHESSI Optical Images
List all



Contents

Introduction

  Solar and space scientists have endeavored for years to predict the occurrence of solar energetic particle (SEP) events. These events have the potential for damaging satellite electronics and providing significant radiation doses to astronauts in space. In Nugget 46 entitled “Soft-Hard-Harder” Sam Krucker and Hugh Hudson describe RHESSI observations of five solar flares that occurred in 2005 January. These observations appear to confirm an earlier study done by Alan Kiplinger using Solar Maximum Mission (SMM HXRBS) data from the 1980’s indicating that soft-hard-harder (SHH) spectral evolution “either over flux peaks or during flux decays” are indicators of an ensuing SEP event. Both studies have also been published in the Astrophysical Journal. It is important to note that the definition of this spectral hardening is somewhat vague and the analyses can be subjective. If one can find SEP events in which the associated flares have no soft-hard-harder characteristics, then the premise can be ruled out.

In this Nugget, we discuss hard X-ray observations of five solar flares between 1998 and 2003 made by Yohkoh and RHESSI that were accompanied by SEP events. In two of the flares we observe progressive spectral hardening, which may be interpreted as SHH evolution in an X-ray peak. We cannot find evidence for SHH spectral evolution in the other flares even though they were associated with SEP having intensities in >400 MeV protons sufficiently high to be detected at ground level on Earth (by neutron monitors).


Method

  The Yohkoh hard X-ray spectrometer (HXS) consisted of a 7.6 cm (diam) by 2.5 cm (thick) NaI scintillator coupled to a photomultiplier tube. It covered the energy range for ~35 keV to 800 keV that varied over the mission. Incident X-ray photons create energetic electrons in NaI that produce light pulses proportional to the amount of energy that they lose. A spectrum of the incident X-ray flux can then be created. We use the front detectors in analysis of the two RHESSI flares.

In order to search for spectral hardening signature we accumulated data in two energy ranges ~50-100 keV and ~100 – 200 keV. In doing this we corrected for gain variations during the Yohkoh HXS mission. We subtracted the background using data taken just before and after the flare, where possible. We determined the RHESSI background using data accumulated under the same environmental conditions 15 orbits earlier and/or later.

For all five flares we plot the number of counts/time interval observed in the ~100 – 200 keV range in the top panel and the ~100-200 keV/~50-100 keV count ratio (hardness ratio) in the bottom panel.  Thus harder spectra will have larger ratios.

==Two Flares Appearing to Exhibit SHH Behavior== 

The 1998 May 6 solar flare observed by Yohkoh occurred at ~W63. The accompanied ground level event (GLE) for this flare was one of the weakest observed to date. The hard x-ray emission occurred primarily in two peaks. In Figure 1 we plot the 100 – 200 keV rates for the second peak in the top panel and the ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio in the bottom panel. The hard X-ray spectrum appears to harden through the second peak and into its decay phase before it softens at the trailing edge.


Figure 1. ~100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio (bottom panel) for the second peak of the 1998 May 6 solar flare.

The 2002 April 21 flare observed by RHESSI occurred at W84 and was accompanied by a solar energetic particle (SEP) that was too soft to be detected at ground level. The X-ray emission came in two peaks. The first one showed no clear spectral evolution but the second one exhibited SHH behavior from onset to the falling edge of the burst, as can be seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2. 100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and 100 – 200 keV/50 – 100 keV hardness ratio (bottom panel) for the second peak of the 2002 April 21 solar flare


Three Solar Flares with No Apparent SHH Spectral Evolution=

The 2000 July 14 ‘Bastille Day solar flare observed by Yohkoh occurred at W07 and gave rise to one of the largest SEP events ever observed. It was also observed at ground level. All of the spectral evolution appears to be of the soft-hard-soft variety as can be seen in Figure 3. A study of this flare has already been published and this lack of a soft-hard-hard evolution was noted. This flare was also the subject of a Yohkoh Nugget (author Hugh Hudson) in June 2001 that also found only SHS evolution based on observations with the HXT experiment on Yohkoh.

Figure 3. ~100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio (bottom panel) for the 2000 July 14 solar flare.


The 2001 April 15 flare observed by Yohkoh occurred at W85. It was associated with one of the largest GLEs seen in Cycle 23.. Once again only soft-hard-soft evolution appears to have been observed as can be seen in Figure 4


Figure 4. ~100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and ~100 – 200 keV/~50 – 100 keV hardness ratio for the 2001 April 15 solar flare.


The 2003 November 2 flare observed by RHESSI occurred at W56 and was also associated with a GLE. The X-ray time history and hardness ratio are plotted in Figure 5. Once again there is no clear evidence for SHH spectral evolution.


Figure 5. 100-200 keV counting rate (top panel) and 100 – 200 keV/50 – 100 keV hardness ratio for the 2003 November 02 solar flare.


Conclusion

  Based on our inspection of five solar flares, all associated with SEP events we find two (one observed by Yohkoh and one by RHESSI) that may be interpreted as soft-hard-harder (SHH) spectral evolution. However, the remaining three flares (two observed by Yohkoh and one observed by RHESSI) only appear to exhibit SHS spectral evolution, at least to our ‘untrained eyes’ (we welcome a dialog on this subject). Thus soft-hard-hard (SHH) spectral evolution is not a necessary condition for production of an SEP event and is not an appropriate predictor for such events.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox