Solar Cycle 24

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Notes)
 
(17 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox Meeting|
{{Infobox Meeting|
|name = Solar Cycle 24
|name = Solar Cycle 24
-
|start_date = 07 Dec 2008
+
|start_date = 7 Dec 2008
|end_date = 12 Dec 2008
|end_date = 12 Dec 2008
|location = Napa, CA, U.S.A.
|location = Napa, CA, U.S.A.
Line 7: Line 7:
}}
}}
== Summary ==
== Summary ==
-
The main goals of this meeting is to assess our current knowledge of solar activity to prepare for observations of the new major activity expected from the beginning of Carrington Cycle 24, and to encourage effective observations of this activity. There will be special emphasis on coordinating ACE, Hinode, STEREO, TRACE/SDO, SOHO, RHESSI and Wind observations, among others including ground-based.  The conference is composed of a mixture of invited and contributed talks in plenary sessions, plus focused working groups and took place December 8 - December 12, 2008.  The week before the AGU Fall meeting in San Francisco.  The location of the meeting is The Embassy Suites Hotel in Napa, California (wine country north of San Francisco). Check-in 16:00, Check-out 12:00. For those staying at the hotel there is daily complimentary cooked-to-order breakfast and evening manager's reception. The registration fee itself covers the meeting, coffee breaks and the conference dinner.  The official website can be found [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/RHESSI/napa2008/groups.php here]
+
The main goals of this meeting were to assess our current knowledge of solar activity, to prepare for observations of the new major activity expected from the beginning of Carrington Cycle 24, and to encourage effective observations of this activity. The organization of the meeting emphasized the coordination of  ACE, Hinode, STEREO, TRACE/SDO, SOHO, RHESSI and Wind observations, among others, and of course ground-based observations as well.  The conference comprised a set of invited and contributed talks in plenary sessions, followed by a set of nine focused working groups. The meeting took place December 8 - December 12, 2008, the week before the AGU Fall meeting in San Francisco.  The official website can be found [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/RHESSI/napa2008/groups.php here], and it includes the [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/RHESSI/napa2008/pts.php link to the presentation files].
 +
For the real-time transcripts of the actual discussions, see the links below please.
-
== Notes ==
+
[[Image:Solar Cycle 24 Poster.jpg|thumb|Meeting Poster]]
-
=== Solar Activity Cycles - Past and Present by D. Hathaway (Marshall Space Flight Center) ===
+
-
Will there be a cycle 24?  New cycle active regions have begun to show up the last two months.  The number of spotless days is more than twice that of the last few cycles.  Also Cycle 23 is the longest cycle than the last few cycles.  Looking at a stastics of older cycles turns out that cycle 23 is not out of the norm.  On average the maximum occurs 4 years after the minimum.  Statistics of cycles suggest that Cycle 24 may be small though cycles have been growing in sunspot number since 1700.  Should we be worried about another Maunder Minimum (one of the grand minimum)?  Grand minimum occur once every 400 years, we are currently in a grand maximum.  "Prediction is very difficult especially about the future" (Niels Bohr).  Forecasting an ongoing cycle is easiest about 2-3 into a new cycle (at the inflection point of the rise).  Geomagnetic precursors suggest a (slightly) smaller than average cycle 24 or a much larger cycle depending on who you talk to.  Geomagnetic indices (and polar field strength) are best at predicting solar cycles.  Polar fields are currently weaker by a factor of 2 than previous solar minimum.  Polar field indices predict a much smaller cycle 24.  The first dynamo predictions suggest a cycle 24 will be much larger than cycle 23 though big cycles usually start early which has not been observed (some caveats suggest that independent confirmation of this prediction is necessary).  Another dynamo model (Choudhuri 2007) predicts a small cycle 24 in keeping with geodynamic predictions (caveats also exist for this method).
+
-
Cycle 24 may be large or small!  And should exist (we hope).  We should know by the end of 2010. 
+
== Schedule ==
-
A link to the powerpoint presentation should be placed here.
+
=== Introductory Plenary Talks ===
 +
Notes on the introductory talks can be found [[Solar Cycle 24 Intro]].
-
=== Recalibration of the Sunspot number and consequences for prediction of future activity and reconstructions of past solar behavior by L. Svalgaard (Stanford U.) ===
+
=== Working Groups ===
 +
Please see the working group section.
-
There are two real long-term sunspot numbers (group number and international number aka Wolf number).  The two indices diverge 1875 making predictions difficult.  People in the prediction business choose the index that works the best for their method. 
+
=== Concluding Plenary Talks ===
-
 
+
For a final overview session on Working Groups B,C,H,I, and J see [[Solar_Cycle_24_BCHIJ|here]].
-
The ratio of the two indices over the time of divergence show systematic changes based on changes in the human observers (~17% changes).  Wolf's own sunspot (Wolf) numbers used past observations and show strange adjustements.  The variation in declination of the geo north varies as a function of day and depends on the solar cycle.  Wolf changed his sunspot numbers based on those measurements.  Using this geomagnetic index it is possible to reconcile the difference between the two indices. 
+
-
 
+
-
Data from the 19th century is currently in the process of being digitized for public distribution.  The difference in the two indices is a problem which needs to be resolved for predictions to go forward. 
+
-
 
+
-
A link to the powerpoint presentation should be placed here.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
=== Evolving views of solar flares, and targets for Cycle 24 by L. Fletcher (U. of Glasgow) ===
+
-
 
+
-
Looking back at cycle 18, Giovanelli (1948) had a very nice model of a solar flares.  Concluded that most of the radiation of flares comes from the chromosphere (as opposed to the corona).  Energy storange is in the corona.  But no knowledge of nonthermal particles and CMEs. 
+
-
 
+
-
What have we learned since then?  Coronal energy is released by topological changes to coronal magnetic fields (reconnection).  Up to 50% of magnetic energy released goes to nonthermal particles.  Accelerated particles are present in both corona and chromosphere.  The chromosphere is heated and radiates stronly and expands. 
+
-
 
+
-
Topological changes in magnetic field create currents which are hard to work out but seems to be located near the neutral line.  Halpha flare ribbons and serperatrix layers are well corolated.  But how do currents change during a flare?
+
-
 
+
-
Energy transport in flares is mostly done by nonthermal particles.  10<sup>28</sup> to 10<sup>29</sup> erg per s goes into electrons.  Similar energy in ions.  The Accelerator is, of course, still unknown (stochastic?  DC fields?). 
+
-
 
+
-
Based on chromospheric HXRs beam models >10% of coronal electrons are accelerated and leave the corona each second.  This is very large (usually refered to as the Numbers problem).  But recent angular distribution measurement suggests that beams do not really exist which mean that we are using the wrong model. 
+
-
 
+
-
Changes in the coronal magnetic structure may show up in
+
-
Need to keep our eye on the chromosphere since most of the energy is released there?  Can the current close in the chromosphere? 
+
-
 
+
-
Main messages, flares are magnetic need to consider energy transport in light of this.
+
-
The corona is a plasma, we must consider plasma effects such as waves and return currents etc.  Most of the flare energy is made manifest in the chromosphere.
+
-
 
+
-
A link to the powerpoint presentation should be placed here.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
=== Global Magnetic Field Evolution by A. Van Ballegooijen ===
+
-
 
+
-
Can deduce global fields by extrapolating photospheric fields (potential, nonpotential, MHD, force-free, PFSS).  Observations suggest that fields are definitely not potential.  Active regions are thought to be loops which emerge from deep twisted magnetic flux tubes.  In the corona the field spreads out.  Fan (2008) has simulated the rise of these flux tubes.  This model suggests that active regions should be much larger (azimuthally).  Something is therefore missing from this model.  Convections may be the key.  Fan (2003) simulated with convective flows.  Speakers own work concentrated on the coupling between the corona and convection zone.  Magnetic diffusion in convection zone is modified to conserve magnetic helicity.  This leads to a build up of magnetic helicity in the corona which eventually leads to a loss of equilibrium.  They also modeled how two active regions interact with each other.  Field lines connect between active regions.  The reserval of the Sun's polar magnetic field can be explained by solar differential rotation.  The effects of active regions after they have decayed and submerged are not well understood.  A new 2D model by speaker (in prep) seeks to understand this.  Active regions tilt the underlying horizontal field consistent with Joy's law.  The cumulative effects of these titls ends up reverses the poloidal field.  Four different processes may be involved in the dissipation of the Sun's toroidal field. 
+
-
* Radial outward diffusion in convection zone.
+
-
* mutual cancellation (at the equator)
+
-
* Loss due to emergence of active region-formig flux tubes.  Not included in most dynamo models.
+
-
* Cancellation of old-cycle flux by new-cycle flux.
+
-
 
+
-
Some conclusions, the upper convection zone is important has it stops the submergence of sheared magnetic fields.  Active regions need to shed helicity by ejecting it (i.e. CMEs).  Active regions effect the underlying submerged fields.
+
-
 
+
-
=== Relationship between the High and Mid latitude Solar Magnetic Field by E. Benevolenskaya given by T. Hoeksema (Stanford U.)===
+
-
 
+
-
Transport of magnetic flux is shown by observations.  In EUV, we see two sets of magnetic structures migrating.  The polar field reversed in about 2000.  The timescale of reversal between north and south are not the same.  A more careful look at the magnetic flux shows the northern hemisphere reversing sooner as well.  A comparison between MDI and WSO data shows a scale factor difference but otherwise good agreement.  One particular difference, MDI shows a large south pole field.  At higher latitudes (75 degrees) then there is a better correspondence with Ulysses.  The discrepancy in the timing of reversal is less at high latitudes.  Following small magnetic elements shows that meriodional flow is very small.  At low latitudes, small magnetic elements shows equator-ward motion.  Conclusions are that zonal or axisymmetrical structure of the solar cycle reveals transport of the magnetic flux between mid to high latitudes.  Migration of the zonal neutral line defines the reversal of the magnetic field during the solar cycle.  The transport of the magnetic energy is a complex process.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
=== Magnetic connectivity and coronal dynamics by H. Peter (Kiepenheuer-Institut) ===
+
-
 
+
-
Studying loops on the Sun have used 1D models which are not very realistic or full 3D models but with limited resolution.  The idea is to braid magnetic field lines.  Currents are then generated and lead to ohmic dissipation and heating.  The code used is a 3D MDH model (so-called Pencil code).  A reasonable agreement of between model doppler shifts and observed shifts.  Same can be said of the emission measure.  1D models are not very good at this.  Looking at individual loops from this model show a spiky structure in the heating rate (maybe associated with "nanoflares").  Temperature profiles show wide variety.  The heating scale height is roughly exponential with a scale height of 10 Mm (heating is concentrated in the chromosphere).  Loops can also be seen to jump around which is further reason that 1D models which track a fixed loop are not reasonable.  Model suggests that small loops seen in the quiet Sun are really just a projection effect and not real.  The isothermal structure is much more complicated than just "traditional" loops.
+
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
=== The Flare/CME Connection by R. Moore (MSFC) ===
+
-
 
+
-
The bottom line is practically every CME is produced with a flare.  Only seems complicated because many CME-associated flares are so weak that they are undetectable.  A CME is a self-propelled magnetic bubble.  The standard model is correct.  The CME is produced with the flare by tether-cutting reconnection and lifts off expanding into the corona.  The cartoon includes a sigmoid with a magnetic flux tube held down by an arcade.  Tether-cutting reconnection begins the eruption.  The escape path of the CME is determined by the surrounding field.  In the outer corona, the CME moves out radially.  Two testable predictions results from this theory which relates to the magnetic field at the flare being related to the angular extent of the flare and CME.  Measured angular widths predict the magnetic field at source. 
+
-
 
+
-
=== HInode and Flare/CME Connections: Events of 19th May, 2008 by J. Culhane (U. College London) ===
+
-
 
+
-
MDI magnetogram of 19th may active region shows a complex region and AR filaments.  Halpha images show the quiescent filament which eventually join up into one filament.  The active section of the filament eventually disappears and then reforms.  Then come filament heating episodes, four of them in all.  These episodes involve complete or practical disappearance of the Halpha features but SXR structures appear.  Models for the merger and eruption of the filaments include simulations by DeVore, Antiochos, and Autanier (2005).  There is no evidence for an instability.  Reconnection region gives a new stable state with higher magnetic energy and smaller kinetic energy.  The eruption may be kink or torus instability.  A summary of the event on may 19th can be found in Veronig (2008).  There is also a B9.5 flare accompanying the filament eruption.  Hinode EIS observations exist and give a temperature of 11-12 MK.  The flare looks like a standard model LDE.  Speeds of 100 km/s are observed during the impulsive phase of the flare. 
+
-
 
+
-
=== Active Region Dynamics, Flux Emergence, and Bright Points by H. Isobe (Kyoto U.) ===
+
-
 
+
-
Problems with current MHD simulations include scales are too small.  Simulations are 10 times smaller than big active regions.  This is a problem because the simulations are driven by the Parker instability which has a characteristic length that is small (factor of ten).  Most simulations assume highly twisted flux tubes but most emerging flux regions are nearly potentially free.  But large twist is necessary otherwise the simulated flux tubes do not emerge from the photosphere.  Weakly twisted tubes expand horizontally and stays quiescent until the flux below is large enough so that a secondary instability begins (Acheson 79).  Convection breaks up flux tubes such that no coherent structure is left.  Ubuquitous small scale horizontal fields are found by Hinode (Lites 2007).  Simulation by speaker shows that chromospheric reconnection prodces high frequency waves.  XRT jets observed in polar region .  X-ray jet are.  Helical jet never seen in MDH simulations.  Hall/ambipolar is significant. 
+
-
 
+
-
=== A new technique for deriving electric fields from sequences of vector magnetograms by G. Fischer (U.C. Berkeley) ===
+
-
 
+
-
Electric fields determine the flux of magnetic energy and magnetic helicity.  Past techniques employ local correlaction tracking to get velocity and calculate v cross B.  A better method exists which consists of using the other components of the magnetic induction equation and magic.  Using synthetic data, this method of finding the electric field was confirmed.  Excellent recovery of the curl of E but only approximate recovery of E.  A variational technique is being developed to fix this problem. 
+
-
 
+
-
=== Where do Solar Filaments Form? by D. MacKay (U. of St. Andrews) ===
+
-
 
+
-
Filaments form over a wide range of latitudes.  There are three different types of filaments; active region filaments, intermediate filaments, and quiescent filaments.  Tang (1987) categorized filaments according to underlying magnetic polarity.  In this case, filaments will be classified by their underlying magnetic polarity.  The four categories are interior BR, exterior BR, interior/exterior BR, diffuse BR filaments (BR = bipolar region).  Filaments observed in Halpha were overlayed onto magnetograms.  Flux transport simulations were used to determine the underlying flux.  It is found that 92% of filaments prefer to form in non-bipolar flux distributions consistent with Tang (1987).  Only EBR showed any cycle variation.  Proposed methods of formation are flux ropes emergence for small AR filaments and large IF, QF come from convergence.
+
== Working Groups ==
== Working Groups ==
Line 127: Line 61:
A summary of the work of this group can be found [[Solar Cycle 24 Group J|here]].
A summary of the work of this group can be found [[Solar Cycle 24 Group J|here]].
 +
== Talks Files ==
 +
Talk files can be found [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/RHESSI/napa2008/pts.php here]
[[Category:Meeting]]
[[Category:Meeting]]

Latest revision as of 20:53, 25 February 2009

Meeting
Name: Solar Cycle 24
Start Date: 7 Dec 2008
End Date: 12 Dec 2008
Location: Napa, CA, U.S.A.
Official Website: http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/RHESSI/napa2008

Contents

Summary

The main goals of this meeting were to assess our current knowledge of solar activity, to prepare for observations of the new major activity expected from the beginning of Carrington Cycle 24, and to encourage effective observations of this activity. The organization of the meeting emphasized the coordination of ACE, Hinode, STEREO, TRACE/SDO, SOHO, RHESSI and Wind observations, among others, and of course ground-based observations as well. The conference comprised a set of invited and contributed talks in plenary sessions, followed by a set of nine focused working groups. The meeting took place December 8 - December 12, 2008, the week before the AGU Fall meeting in San Francisco. The official website can be found here, and it includes the link to the presentation files. For the real-time transcripts of the actual discussions, see the links below please.

Meeting Poster

Schedule

Introductory Plenary Talks

Notes on the introductory talks can be found Solar Cycle 24 Intro.

Working Groups

Please see the working group section.

Concluding Plenary Talks

For a final overview session on Working Groups B,C,H,I, and J see here.

Working Groups

Group B (Fast Solar Wind & Plumes)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group C (Magnetic Field Evolution)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group D (Global event energetics)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group E (Flares)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group F (CMEs)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group G (Microflares and Nanoflares)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group H (The Chromosphere)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group I (Active Region Loops)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Group J (Filaments and Prominences)

A summary of the work of this group can be found here.

Talks Files

Talk files can be found here

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox