Stereoscopic Flares and CMEs

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 15: Line 15:
The observations given in these Nuggets primarily come from the time when the Sun was still active.  
The observations given in these Nuggets primarily come from the time when the Sun was still active.  
Wishing for another solar maximum to come again in our lifetime, this Nugget takes up a similar subject on the basis of [http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Solar_Satellites STEREO] observations of flares during 2007-2009. In retrospect, December 2006 was the last active period, having produced four X-class flares.  
Wishing for another solar maximum to come again in our lifetime, this Nugget takes up a similar subject on the basis of [http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Solar_Satellites STEREO] observations of flares during 2007-2009. In retrospect, December 2006 was the last active period, having produced four X-class flares.  
-
We had 11 M-class and 84 C-class flares between January 2007 and October 2009. They have allowed us to reconfirm that flares, if not X-class, are not highly correlated with CMEs, and to find that one of the CME-related signatures, namely large-scale coronal dimming, is a good indicator of a flare-associated CME. A summary of this study is given [http://www.lmsal.com/nitta/movies/flares_euvi/index.html here] with all the associated movies and plots. The summary table, which is occasionally updated, includes all the M- and C-class flares between March 2007 and July 2009 as well as many isolated B- and A-class flares or even non flares.
+
We had 11 M-class and 95 C-class flares between January 2007 and October 2009. They have allowed us to reconfirm that flares, if not X-class, are not highly correlated with CMEs, and to find that one of the CME-related signatures, namely large-scale coronal dimming, is a good indicator of a flare-associated CME. A summary of this study is given [http://www.lmsal.com/nitta/movies/flares_euvi/index.html here] with all the associated movies and plots. The summary table, which is occasionally updated, includes all the M- and C-class flares between March 2007 and July 2009 as well as many isolated B- and A-class flares or even non flares.
== CME formation close to the Sun ==
== CME formation close to the Sun ==

Revision as of 05:19, 10 November 2009


Stereoscopic Flares and CMEs
Number: 114
1st Author: Nariaki Nitta
2nd Author:
Published: 9 November 2009
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: Imaging through visibility interpolation: uv-smooth
List all



Contents

Introduction

Recent RHESSI Science Nuggets (e.g., 12 August 2009, 31 August 2009) discussed interesting observations that may give a clue to the long-standing problem of the relation between CMEs and flares. The observations given in these Nuggets primarily come from the time when the Sun was still active. Wishing for another solar maximum to come again in our lifetime, this Nugget takes up a similar subject on the basis of STEREO observations of flares during 2007-2009. In retrospect, December 2006 was the last active period, having produced four X-class flares. We had 11 M-class and 95 C-class flares between January 2007 and October 2009. They have allowed us to reconfirm that flares, if not X-class, are not highly correlated with CMEs, and to find that one of the CME-related signatures, namely large-scale coronal dimming, is a good indicator of a flare-associated CME. A summary of this study is given here with all the associated movies and plots. The summary table, which is occasionally updated, includes all the M- and C-class flares between March 2007 and July 2009 as well as many isolated B- and A-class flares or even non flares.

CME formation close to the Sun

We were made aware that a spectacular CME can be launched without appreciable signatures in the corona by a striking example. But if the CME is somehow associated with a flare, we can expect the first CME manifestation to be seen close to the Sun, say within 0.5 solar radius above the solar surface. The C1 telescope of SOHO LASCO delivered such observations, but it stopped functioning in June 1998. Now each STEREO spacecraft carries a coronagraph (COR1) whose starting height is 1.3 solar radius from the center. By combining data from COR1 and EUVI (which is an instrument like SOHO EIT), we can easily confirm the occurrence of a CME in association with the given flare. The increasing separation of the STEREO spacecraft reduces the dependence of CME visibility due to Thomson scattering. Even if one CME is largely out of the plane of the sky as viewed by one coronagraph, it can be a limb CME as viewed by another coronagraph. We used the FESTIVAL software as included in SolarSoft. Two examples are shown in Figures 1 and 2 below (click on each to run a Quicktime movie).

Figure 1: Link to a movie; click to here to play.
Figure 2: Link to a movie; click here to play.





Decoupling of flares from CMEs -- dependence of ARs

By comparing these EUVI-COR1 movies with COR2 movies available with, e.g., the NRL SECCHI movie maker, it is found that only a small number of M- and C-class flares were unambiguously associated with CMEs. Examples are: 2007/06/03 09 UT, 2007/12/31 00 UT, 2008/03/25 18 UT. One can argue that experts can identify more CMEs, but are those CMEs that the experts label "Very Poor" (see, for example, the CDAW LASCO CME catalog) really proper CMEs? It would be interesting to compare with events selected by automated CME detection schemes such as CACTus. We note that the poor association of these M- and C-class flares with CMEs is largely affected by the fact that they occurred in a small number of active regions that happened to be CME-poor. They are AR 0960 (June 2007), AR 0963 (July 2007), AR 0978 (December 2007), and AR 1024 (July 2009). These regions had relatively large (200-600 millionth) sunspot areas, and high flux near sheared polarity inversion (as indicated by MDI data), which may indeed be used to forecast major flares. One needs to be careful when referring to large flares and CMEs as those these were interchangeable names. They may indeed be synonymous for extremely big events, but the same is not true for more frequent events. The CME-productive regions (such as AR 0956) or those that produced at least one decent CME did not have particularly large spot areas (when large CMEs occurred) or sheared polarity inversion lines. The flares in these regions were below C-class. In fact, the examples shown above (Figures 1 and 2) occurred in regions with sunspot area of only 10 millionths and thus contained no large sunspot.

Dimming and waves

We have analyzed EUVI data to associate the presence or absence of CME with coronal dimming and EUV waves. In order to observe these phenomena, we should use two kinds of difference images, that is a running difference (successive images of a sequence differenced) and a base difference (the first or some pre-event reference image is subtracted). The EUV waves were first identified in running difference images, but base difference images capture long-lasting dimmings better. There are technical issues regarding how to correct for solar differential rotation, so there is a limit to the span of a useful base-difference image. There are several publications that show both sets. The following example (Figure 3) shows both types (left: running difference, right: base difference).

Figure 3: Link to a movie; click here to play.

The impression from repeated viewing of the movies is usually consistent with more quantitative analysis as to the magnitude of the dimming that may be correlated with the energy of the associated CME. Even though the CME may start small and become larger-scale as it propagates, its associated dimming is expected to be large. Therefore we study the light curves in summed pixels or macro pixels. Here we summed 40x40 EUVI full resoluton pixels (about 1.6 arcseconds). An example is shown in the "confusogram" here. If there are more than 10 macropixels which start to dim around the flare onset and go down below 90% of the pre-event value, at least in two wavelength channels, then a subsantial CME will be seen. This is a rule of thumb. There were a number of events with clear wave-like propagations. Some of them are associated with only minor (diffuse, narrow, slow) CMEs if dimming does not meet the above criterion.

Conclusions

The main purpose of this nugget is to remind the reader that flares can be poorly correlated with CMEs depending on the source regions. Large sunspot areas and strong shear (as found in longitudinal magnetograms) may not necessarily signal CMEs, although they may be linked to major flares. Coronal dimming in EUV images could partly be due to a temperature effect, but if it is large and deep enough to be clearly identified, it is a good indicator of the CME and CME size. Some homework for the RHESSI workers is to determine whether it is possible to distinguish flares associated with major CMEs from those not associated, on the basis of hard X-ray images.

References

[1] A Comparative Study between Eruptive X-Class Flares Associated with Coronal Mass Ejections and Confined X-Class Flares

[2] History and Basic Characteristics of Eruptive Flares

[3] Coronal mass ejections and associated X-ray flare durations

[4] The nature of solar flares associated with coronal mass ejection

[5] Visibility of coronal mass ejections as a function of flare location and intensity

[6] Torus Instability

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox