The true dawn of multimessenger astronomy

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(draft 328)
 
(9 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
|first_author = Hugh Hudson
|first_author = Hugh Hudson
|publish_date = 23 July 2018
|publish_date = 23 July 2018
-
|next_nugget= TBD
+
|next_nugget={{#ask: [[Category:Nugget]] [[RHESSI Nugget Index::329]]}}
-
|previous_nugget=[http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/Microwave_Imaging_Spectroscopy_of_Flares_is_Here EOVSA]
+
|previous_nugget={{#ask: [[Category:Nugget]] [[RHESSI Nugget Index::327]]}}
}}
}}
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
-
The discovery of astrophysical sources of gravitational waves has been accompanied by
+
The discovery of astrophysical sources of  
-
detections of the sources in ordinary electromagnetic radiation - a physically distinct
+
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave gravitational waves], remarkably, also saw detections of the event in  
-
"messenger".  
+
ordinary electromagnetic radiation - a physically distinct "messenger".  
-
This has been touted by astronomers as the dawn of "multi-messenger astronomy", with the
+
Some astronomers regard this as the actual dawn of  
-
messengers being gravitational waves, electromagnetic waves, and potentially neutrinos.
+
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-messenger_astronomy "multi-messenger astronomy"], with the
-
This Nugget points out that diverse suite of astronomical messengers has existed for solar
+
messengers being gravitational waves, electromagnetic waves, neutrinos, and potentially, the cosmic rays themselves.
-
flares since Carrington's discovery of SOL1859-09-01.
+
This Nugget points out that a diverse suite of astronomical messengers has existed for solar
-
This list has grown from two (at that time) to many, and of course research work on the
+
flares since [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Christopher_Carrington Carrington's] discovery of [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/The_1859_Space_Weather_Event_Revisited SOL1859-09-01].
-
physics of solar flares and CMEs depends heavily on exploiting this list.
+
This list has grown from three (at that time) to many, and of course current research work on the
 +
physics of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare solar flares],
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_mass_ejection CMEs], and other aspects of solar physics depends heavily on exploiting this list.
== The solar multi-messenger list ==
== The solar multi-messenger list ==
-
1) Electromagnetic radiation. Of course Carrington saw the flare in white light, ordinary
+
1) '''Electromagnetic radiation'''. Of course Carrington saw the flare in white light, ordinary
electromagnetic radiation.  
electromagnetic radiation.  
Nowadays we have become accustomed to the very broad-band nature of this radiation, which  
Nowadays we have become accustomed to the very broad-band nature of this radiation, which  
has arguably been detected from about 10 kHz to about 10 GeV, a phenomenal span of some  
has arguably been detected from about 10 kHz to about 10 GeV, a phenomenal span of some  
21 decades (or maybe 70 octaves).
21 decades (or maybe 70 octaves).
-
It is interesting to note that the magnetic "crochet" noted in the Kew magnetometer records
+
It is interesting to note that a magnetic "crochet," as noted in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kew_Gardens Kew Gardens] magnetometer records
of 1859 now is known to result from soft X-radiation impinging on the ionosphere; of course
of 1859 now is known to result from soft X-radiation impinging on the ionosphere; of course
-
this observation preceded Rontgen and Heaviside historically, and so the messenger had  
+
this observation preceded [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelm_Röntgen Röntgen]  and  
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Heaviside Heaviside] historically, and so the messenger had  
to wait to be recognized as such.
to wait to be recognized as such.
-
2) Plasma ejecta. This is the second messenger in Carrington's flare, detected (again
+
2) '''Plasma ejecta'''. This is the second messenger in Carrington's flare, detected (again
mysteriously) via its sustained driving of a geomagnetic storm.  
mysteriously) via its sustained driving of a geomagnetic storm.  
The message they carry is that the flare/CME process can hurl masses on the scale of major
The message they carry is that the flare/CME process can hurl masses on the scale of major
comets, at many times escape velocity, into the heliosphere.
comets, at many times escape velocity, into the heliosphere.
-
3) Shock waves. The third messenger, essentially a hydrodynamic shock wave but propagating
+
3) '''Shock waves'''. The third messenger, essentially a hydrodynamic shock wave but propagating
in the magnetized solar wind, produces a "Storm Sudden Commencement (SSC)" via its impulse  
in the magnetized solar wind, produces a "Storm Sudden Commencement (SSC)" via its impulse  
-
on the geomagnetic field. This also appeared in the Carrington flare, driving the Kew Gardens
+
on the geomagnetic field. This also appeared in the Carrington flare, driving the  
-
compass needles off scale.
+
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kew_Gardens Kew Gardens]
 +
compass needles (now a matter of history) off scale.
All three of these messengers can be seen in the Kew Gardens magnetometer traces shown
All three of these messengers can be seen in the Kew Gardens magnetometer traces shown
in Figure 1 here.
in Figure 1 here.
-
[[File:328f1.png|400px|thumb|center|Figure 1: The magnetometer traces from Kew Gardens
+
[[File:328f1.png|400px|thumb|center|Figure 1: The magnetometer traces from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kew_Gardens Kew Gardens]
for the Carrington flare.
for the Carrington flare.
-
There are three days shown, each in the three magnetic components detected, with the
+
The figure shows three consecutive days, each in the three magnetic components detected, with the
-
pre-event days establishing the unperturbed daily variations.
+
pre-event days establishing the stability of unperturbed daily variations.
One does not see the white-light flare here, but the early deflections are the soft X-ray
One does not see the white-light flare here, but the early deflections are the soft X-ray
"crochet" and the late deflections include the SSC and geomagnetic storm.
"crochet" and the late deflections include the SSC and geomagnetic storm.
These recordings were made by delicate electromechanical instrumentation without benefit of
These recordings were made by delicate electromechanical instrumentation without benefit of
-
electronics, a world apart from [LIGO] but certainly also at the cutting edge of existing
+
electronics, a world apart from [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LIGO LIGO] but certainly also at the cutting edge of existing
technology.
technology.
(from [Ref. 1]).
(from [Ref. 1]).
]]
]]
-
 
+
4) '''Cosmic rays'''. Not noted until the 1940s, "solar cosmic rays" (SEPs) are close kin of galactic  
-
4) Cosmic rays. Noted in the 1930s, "solar cosmic rays" (SEPs) are close kin of galactic  
+
cosmic rays, and reveal that the flare/CME process can accelerate particles to relativistic
cosmic rays, and reveal that the flare/CME process can accelerate particles to relativistic
energies and in great profusion.
energies and in great profusion.
 +
Thus, flares/CMEs have a baryonic messenger.
-
5) Neutrinos. These have not been detected from solar flares, but the Nobel prizewinner Ray  
+
5) '''Neutrinos'''. These have not been detected from solar flares, but the Nobel prizewinner Ray  
Davis enjoyed speculating about their contribution to the anomalously large neutrino
Davis enjoyed speculating about their contribution to the anomalously large neutrino
counts his Homestake Mine experiment was detecting (Ref. [2]) and, of course, upper limits
counts his Homestake Mine experiment was detecting (Ref. [2]) and, of course, upper limits
also have some physical significance.
also have some physical significance.
 +
This messenger definitely has interesting news about stellar structure and about basic physics.
-
6) Gravitational waves. Again these have not been detected, but must exist because of the
+
6) '''Gravitational waves'''. Again these have not been detected, but must exist because of the
quadrupole impulse of the flare ejecta. Here there is an upper limit that is so outlandishly
quadrupole impulse of the flare ejecta. Here there is an upper limit that is so outlandishly
high that there do not appear to be any speculations whatsoever!
high that there do not appear to be any speculations whatsoever!
-
7) Axions. The  
+
7) '''Axions'''. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primakoff_effect Primakoff effect] guarantees  
-
[Primakoff effect] guarantees an axion flux secondary to the flare X-rays,  
+
an axion flux secondary to the flare X-rays,  
-
if these important but hypothetical particles exist.
+
if these important but still hypothetical particles actually do exist.
Again, upper limits matter, but again, these would almost certainly not be interesting
Again, upper limits matter, but again, these would almost certainly not be interesting
-
ones in the solar case.
+
ones in the solar-flare case.
 +
Again, this messenger would have significance for stellar structure and for basic physics.
-
8) Neutrons. One might be tempted to say that this is not an independent class of messenger,
+
8) '''Neutrons'''. One might be tempted to say that this is not an independent class of messenger,
since neutrons are merely more baryons.
since neutrons are merely more baryons.
These could never be detected directly from a non-solar source because of the radioactive
These could never be detected directly from a non-solar source because of the radioactive
Line 84: Line 90:
Solar neutrons have been detected both indirectly (as decay products) and directly.
Solar neutrons have been detected both indirectly (as decay products) and directly.
-
9) Energetic neutral atoms. Again, this messenger could never be detected from an extrasolar  
+
9) '''Energetic neutral atoms'''. Again, this messenger could never be detected from an extrasolar  
source because they would convert to ions on a relatively short time scale.  
source because they would convert to ions on a relatively short time scale.  
In one well-documented solar flare, ENAs have been detected (Ref. [3]), and almost certainly  
In one well-documented solar flare, ENAs have been detected (Ref. [3]), and almost certainly  
would become an interesting routine messenger with the right instrumentation.
would become an interesting routine messenger with the right instrumentation.
 +
 +
10) '''Interior acoustic waves'''. Not really analogous to the well-known
 +
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baryon_acoustic_oscillations baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO)], these are running waves
 +
embodying the flare mechanical impulse on the body of the Sun.
 +
Perhaps the BAO are more like the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Cowling p-modes] inverted in the unit sphere!
== Conclusion ==
== Conclusion ==

Latest revision as of 17:52, 22 August 2018


Nugget
Number: 328
1st Author: Hugh Hudson
2nd Author:
Published: 23 July 2018
Next Nugget: 3D Magnetic Reconnection at a Coronal Null Point
Previous Nugget: Microwave Imaging Spectroscopy of Flares is Here
List all



Contents

Introduction

The discovery of astrophysical sources of gravitational waves, remarkably, also saw detections of the event in ordinary electromagnetic radiation - a physically distinct "messenger". Some astronomers regard this as the actual dawn of "multi-messenger astronomy", with the messengers being gravitational waves, electromagnetic waves, neutrinos, and potentially, the cosmic rays themselves. This Nugget points out that a diverse suite of astronomical messengers has existed for solar flares since Carrington's discovery of SOL1859-09-01. This list has grown from three (at that time) to many, and of course current research work on the physics of solar flares, CMEs, and other aspects of solar physics depends heavily on exploiting this list.

The solar multi-messenger list

1) Electromagnetic radiation. Of course Carrington saw the flare in white light, ordinary electromagnetic radiation. Nowadays we have become accustomed to the very broad-band nature of this radiation, which has arguably been detected from about 10 kHz to about 10 GeV, a phenomenal span of some 21 decades (or maybe 70 octaves). It is interesting to note that a magnetic "crochet," as noted in the Kew Gardens magnetometer records of 1859 now is known to result from soft X-radiation impinging on the ionosphere; of course this observation preceded Röntgen and Heaviside historically, and so the messenger had to wait to be recognized as such.

2) Plasma ejecta. This is the second messenger in Carrington's flare, detected (again mysteriously) via its sustained driving of a geomagnetic storm. The message they carry is that the flare/CME process can hurl masses on the scale of major comets, at many times escape velocity, into the heliosphere.

3) Shock waves. The third messenger, essentially a hydrodynamic shock wave but propagating in the magnetized solar wind, produces a "Storm Sudden Commencement (SSC)" via its impulse on the geomagnetic field. This also appeared in the Carrington flare, driving the Kew Gardens compass needles (now a matter of history) off scale.

All three of these messengers can be seen in the Kew Gardens magnetometer traces shown in Figure 1 here.

Figure 1: The magnetometer traces from Kew Gardens for the Carrington flare. The figure shows three consecutive days, each in the three magnetic components detected, with the pre-event days establishing the stability of unperturbed daily variations. One does not see the white-light flare here, but the early deflections are the soft X-ray "crochet" and the late deflections include the SSC and geomagnetic storm. These recordings were made by delicate electromechanical instrumentation without benefit of electronics, a world apart from LIGO but certainly also at the cutting edge of existing technology. (from [Ref. 1]).

4) Cosmic rays. Not noted until the 1940s, "solar cosmic rays" (SEPs) are close kin of galactic cosmic rays, and reveal that the flare/CME process can accelerate particles to relativistic energies and in great profusion. Thus, flares/CMEs have a baryonic messenger.

5) Neutrinos. These have not been detected from solar flares, but the Nobel prizewinner Ray Davis enjoyed speculating about their contribution to the anomalously large neutrino counts his Homestake Mine experiment was detecting (Ref. [2]) and, of course, upper limits also have some physical significance. This messenger definitely has interesting news about stellar structure and about basic physics.

6) Gravitational waves. Again these have not been detected, but must exist because of the quadrupole impulse of the flare ejecta. Here there is an upper limit that is so outlandishly high that there do not appear to be any speculations whatsoever!

7) Axions. The Primakoff effect guarantees an axion flux secondary to the flare X-rays, if these important but still hypothetical particles actually do exist. Again, upper limits matter, but again, these would almost certainly not be interesting ones in the solar-flare case. Again, this messenger would have significance for stellar structure and for basic physics.

8) Neutrons. One might be tempted to say that this is not an independent class of messenger, since neutrons are merely more baryons. These could never be detected directly from a non-solar source because of the radioactive decay of the messenger on a relatively short time scale. Solar neutrons have been detected both indirectly (as decay products) and directly.

9) Energetic neutral atoms. Again, this messenger could never be detected from an extrasolar source because they would convert to ions on a relatively short time scale. In one well-documented solar flare, ENAs have been detected (Ref. [3]), and almost certainly would become an interesting routine messenger with the right instrumentation.

10) Interior acoustic waves. Not really analogous to the well-known baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), these are running waves embodying the flare mechanical impulse on the body of the Sun. Perhaps the BAO are more like the p-modes inverted in the unit sphere!

Conclusion

Solar flares and CMEs announce their presence via many messengers. These are basically the same ones noted for the wonderful new gravitational-wave detections, but in different measures (i.e., completely undetectable as gravitational waves - but then, coalescing black holes were undetectable only a few years ago). The same messengers must exist, because solar flares and neutron stars occupy the same universe and and share the same physical laws. At present, because of its proximity, we have a broader array of messengers from the Sun than from any other astronomical object. Also, they began to arrive in the 19th century.

References

[1] "Geomagnetism"

[2] "A Review of Measurements of the Solar Neutrino Flux and their Variation"

[3] "STEREO Observations of Energetic Neutral Hydrogen Atoms During the 2006 December 5 Solar Flare"

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox