Collapsing Traps

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Introduction: Revised with a simpler figure and an introductory paragraph Boris may not like.)
(Conclusions drafted. Now just need some pretty data!)
Line 14: Line 14:
Particle acceleration is one of the more perplexing issues as we try to understand how solar flares work.
Particle acceleration is one of the more perplexing issues as we try to understand how solar flares work.
The particles (electrons at 10s of keV, and ions at MeV energies) contain a large fraction of the total flare energy.  
The particles (electrons at 10s of keV, and ions at MeV energies) contain a large fraction of the total flare energy.  
-
Thus one cannot expect to find a self-consistent fluid ([[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics MHD]]) model.
+
Thus one cannot expect to find a self-consistent fluid ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetohydrodynamics MHD]) model.
Nevertheless virtually all of the theoretical work on large-scale aspects of solar flares is presently within the MHD framework.
Nevertheless virtually all of the theoretical work on large-scale aspects of solar flares is presently within the MHD framework.
In the topic described here there are features both of large-scale MHD concepts and also particle acceleration, so these ideas are somehow very attractive!
In the topic described here there are features both of large-scale MHD concepts and also particle acceleration, so these ideas are somehow very attractive!
The coronal magnetic field can undergo large-scale restructurings during a flare or CME.
The coronal magnetic field can undergo large-scale restructurings during a flare or CME.
-
If this restructuring happens [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guiding_center adiabatically]], i.e. on scales large compared with the  
+
If this restructuring happens [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guiding_center adiabatically], i.e. on scales large compared with the  
-
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_radius Larmor motion]] of the particles in question, they can gain or lose energy.
+
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_radius Larmor motion] of the particles in question, they can gain or lose energy.
A "collapsing trap" is exactly the sort of geometry expected from large-scale magnetic reconnection, and so this concept provides a basic mechanism for particle acceleration in a flare or CME.
A "collapsing trap" is exactly the sort of geometry expected from large-scale magnetic reconnection, and so this concept provides a basic mechanism for particle acceleration in a flare or CME.
The sketches in Figure 1 show how this might work.
The sketches in Figure 1 show how this might work.
There is a lot more detail than needed in the sketches; basically on the left one sees a reconnected magnetic field line "dipolarizing" rapidly, and on the left slowly.
There is a lot more detail than needed in the sketches; basically on the left one sees a reconnected magnetic field line "dipolarizing" rapidly, and on the left slowly.
-
This process is the basic element of the standard reconnection models of solar flares, as explained copiously elsewhere among the Nuggets (for example, [[http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/nuggets/?page=article&article_id=40 here]].
+
This process is the basic element of the standard reconnection models of solar flares, as explained copiously elsewhere among the Nuggets (for example, [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/nuggets/?page=article&article_id=40 here].
-
[[Image:trap_cartoon.jpg|250px|thumb|left| A collapsing magnetic trap following large-scale coronal reconnection. The longer arrow shows the field deforming, so rapidly as to induce a fast-mode shock wave ("SW").]]
+
[[Image:trap_cartoon.jpg|250px|thumb|left|'''Figure 1''': A collapsing magnetic trap following large-scale coronal reconnection. The longer arrow shows the field deforming, so rapidly as to induce a fast-mode shock wave ("SW").]]
==Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration==
==Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration==
-
A collapsing trap actually may accelerate particles in two distinct ways: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betatron "betatron"]] and first-order [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_acceleration Fermi acceleration]].
+
A collapsing trap actually may accelerate particles in two distinct ways: [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betatron "betatron"]] and first-order [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_acceleration Fermi acceleration].
These result respectively from diminishing diameter of the collapsing flux tube, and from its decreasing length.
These result respectively from diminishing diameter of the collapsing flux tube, and from its decreasing length.
The latter is easier to understand - as the trap shortens, the two reflective mirrors apparently ''approach'' one another.
The latter is easier to understand - as the trap shortens, the two reflective mirrors apparently ''approach'' one another.
The motion of the mirror means that the reflected particle gains energy.
The motion of the mirror means that the reflected particle gains energy.
-
To understand the betatron process one has to follow the basic physics of adiabatic particle motion; essentially the particle energy must increase as the magnitude of '''B''' increases during the collapse.
+
To understand the betatron process one has to follow the basic physics of adiabatic particle motion; essentially the particle energy increases proportionally to the magnitude of '''B''' during the collapse.
 +
The Fermi process is a little more complicated since it depends on the field geometry in a more complicated way.
-
[[Image:simple_trap.jpg|350px|thumb|right| Simplification of the collapsing trap to show the two processes at work. Contraction of the trap in length causes Fermi acceleration, and contraction perpendicular to '''B''' causes betatron acceleration.]]
+
[[Image:simple_trap.jpg|300px|thumb|right|'''Figure 2:''' Simplification of the geometry. Contraction of the trap in length L causes Fermi acceleration, and contraction perpendicular to '''B''' causes betatron acceleration.]]
This rough description omits a great deal of complexity.
This rough description omits a great deal of complexity.
Even though the basic physics is straightforward, and has been known for many decades, the application to an astrophysical situation requires that we know what particles are there, how the flows in the plasma proceed, and other somewhat intangible details involving wave-particle interactions.
Even though the basic physics is straightforward, and has been known for many decades, the application to an astrophysical situation requires that we know what particles are there, how the flows in the plasma proceed, and other somewhat intangible details involving wave-particle interactions.
To assess these complicated issues in a satisfactory manner really requires model-building, using realistic parameters taken from the observations as a guide.
To assess these complicated issues in a satisfactory manner really requires model-building, using realistic parameters taken from the observations as a guide.
 +
We also need to bear in mind the distribution function of the particles prior to the collapse.
==Some Data==
==Some Data==
==Conclusion==
==Conclusion==
 +
 +
The basic idea of the collapsing trap was introduced to flare physics in the 1970s by John Brown and Peter Hoyng.
 +
It has come back into vogue not only because of the new information about coronal hard X-ray sources mentioned above, but also because of the growth of the new field of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronal_seismology coronal seismology].
 +
We've already touched on this in an [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/nuggets/?page=article&article_id=7 earlier Nugget].
 +
(Yet another Nugget dealt with the probably not unrelated [http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/nuggets/?page=article&article_id=26 sunquakes]).
 +
We look forward to the complete surveys of oscillations in the solar corona that the soon-to-be-launched [[http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/ Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)]] will provide.
 +
Data comparisons between RHESSI and SDO's imager [http://aia.lmsal.com/ AIA] instrument will be informative.
 +
Will these new observations provide further insight into the acceleration mechanisms implied by the "collapsing trap"?

Revision as of 12:43, 19 January 2009


Nugget
Number: 94
1st Author: Boris Somov
2nd Author: Hugh Hudson
Published: 19 January 2009
Next Nugget: A Quantum of Solar
Previous Nugget: RHESSI_Simulations_of_Complicated_Flares
List all



Contents

Introduction

Particle acceleration is one of the more perplexing issues as we try to understand how solar flares work. The particles (electrons at 10s of keV, and ions at MeV energies) contain a large fraction of the total flare energy. Thus one cannot expect to find a self-consistent fluid (MHD) model. Nevertheless virtually all of the theoretical work on large-scale aspects of solar flares is presently within the MHD framework. In the topic described here there are features both of large-scale MHD concepts and also particle acceleration, so these ideas are somehow very attractive!

The coronal magnetic field can undergo large-scale restructurings during a flare or CME. If this restructuring happens adiabatically, i.e. on scales large compared with the Larmor motion of the particles in question, they can gain or lose energy. A "collapsing trap" is exactly the sort of geometry expected from large-scale magnetic reconnection, and so this concept provides a basic mechanism for particle acceleration in a flare or CME. The sketches in Figure 1 show how this might work. There is a lot more detail than needed in the sketches; basically on the left one sees a reconnected magnetic field line "dipolarizing" rapidly, and on the left slowly. This process is the basic element of the standard reconnection models of solar flares, as explained copiously elsewhere among the Nuggets (for example, here.

Figure 1: A collapsing magnetic trap following large-scale coronal reconnection. The longer arrow shows the field deforming, so rapidly as to induce a fast-mode shock wave ("SW").

Betatron vs First-order Fermi Acceleration

A collapsing trap actually may accelerate particles in two distinct ways: ["betatron"] and first-order Fermi acceleration. These result respectively from diminishing diameter of the collapsing flux tube, and from its decreasing length. The latter is easier to understand - as the trap shortens, the two reflective mirrors apparently approach one another. The motion of the mirror means that the reflected particle gains energy. To understand the betatron process one has to follow the basic physics of adiabatic particle motion; essentially the particle energy increases proportionally to the magnitude of B during the collapse. The Fermi process is a little more complicated since it depends on the field geometry in a more complicated way.

Figure 2: Simplification of the geometry. Contraction of the trap in length L causes Fermi acceleration, and contraction perpendicular to B causes betatron acceleration.

This rough description omits a great deal of complexity. Even though the basic physics is straightforward, and has been known for many decades, the application to an astrophysical situation requires that we know what particles are there, how the flows in the plasma proceed, and other somewhat intangible details involving wave-particle interactions. To assess these complicated issues in a satisfactory manner really requires model-building, using realistic parameters taken from the observations as a guide. We also need to bear in mind the distribution function of the particles prior to the collapse.

Some Data

Conclusion

The basic idea of the collapsing trap was introduced to flare physics in the 1970s by John Brown and Peter Hoyng. It has come back into vogue not only because of the new information about coronal hard X-ray sources mentioned above, but also because of the growth of the new field of coronal seismology. We've already touched on this in an earlier Nugget. (Yet another Nugget dealt with the probably not unrelated sunquakes). We look forward to the complete surveys of oscillations in the solar corona that the soon-to-be-launched [Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO)] will provide. Data comparisons between RHESSI and SDO's imager AIA instrument will be informative. Will these new observations provide further insight into the acceleration mechanisms implied by the "collapsing trap"?

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox