Dips and Waves

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(typos and grammar rectification - still need to add links)
m
 
(6 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
|number = 115
|number = 115
|first_author = Iain Hannah  
|first_author = Iain Hannah  
-
|second_author =  
+
|second_author = Eduard Kontar
|publish_date = 23 November 2009
|publish_date = 23 November 2009
-
|next_nugget = TBD
+
|next_nugget = [[A tiny white-light flare‎]]
|previous_nugget = [[STEREO observations of flares and their associations with CMEs]]
|previous_nugget = [[STEREO observations of flares and their associations with CMEs]]
}}
}}
Line 12: Line 12:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
-
Solar flares feature the acceleration of non-thermal particles ofseveral descriptions.
+
Solar flares feature the acceleration of non-thermal particles of several descriptions.
-
One of RHESSI's primary tasks is to study these particles via their [bremsstrahlung] X-rays.
+
One of RHESSI's primary tasks is to study these particles via their [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung bremsstrahlung] X-rays.
-
The X-ray spectrum typically follows a power law at high energies "hard X-rays", and an exponential at lower "soft X-ray" energies; in the standard interpretation these components reveal (respectively) the primary
+
The X-ray spectrum typically follows a power law at high energies "hard X-rays", and an exponential at lower "soft X-ray" energies; in the standard interpretation these components reveal (respectively) the non-thermal energetic particles and hot plasma in the corona. The theory of the nonthermal x-ray radiation involves several processes: the  
-
particle acceleration and its [Maxwellianized] "thermal" heating.The theory of the nonthermal radiation involves several processes: the  
+
initial acceleration of the particles, their propagation through the solar atmosphere, and their X-ray production as they lose energy to the background plasma. With several assumptions, can be wrapped up into a tractable problem in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_theory inverse theory]. When this was first done at RHESSI's high spectral resolution, a new and unexpected feature tended to appear: a dip in the spectrum at about 30 keV.
-
initial acceleration of the particles, their propagation through the solar atmosphere, and their X-ray production as they lose energy to thebackground plasma.With several assumptions, all of this theory can be wrapped up intoa tractable problem in [inverse theory].
+
-
When this was first done at RHESSI's [high spectral resolution], a new and unexpected feature tended to appear: a [dip] in the spectrum at about 30 keV.</p>
+
-
<p>There has been some heated discussion (for instance in this earlier
+
There has been some heated discussion (for instance in this earlier
[http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_The_Low_Energy_Cut_Off Nugget])
[http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~tohban/wiki/index.php/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_The_Low_Energy_Cut_Off Nugget])
-
as to whether this "dip" seen in the mean
+
as to whether this "dip" seen in the mean electron spectrum derived from RHESSI X-ray observations
-
electron spectrum derived from RHESSI X-ray observations
+
is a real feature. It can often be removed by correcting for the
-
is a real feature.
+
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo albedo] flux of X-rays scattered back to the observer from the solar atmosphere beneath the source.  
-
It can often be removed by correcting for the
+
But for flares with relatively low thermal mission, the standard thick-target interpretation says that for an accelerated population of electrons above a low-energy cutoff the dip  
-
[albedo] flux of X-rays scattered back to the observer
+
must be there. The thick-target model only accounts for Coulomb collisions between the
-
from the solar atmosphere beneath the source.  
+
propagating beam of accelerated electrons and the background plasma. In this Nugget we present simulation results from our recent [http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0314 paper], where we show what happens to the dip when you also include wave-particle interactions between the beam and the background plasma.
-
But for flares with relatively low thermal mission the
+
-
standard [thick-target] interpretation says that the dip  
+
-
must be there.
+
-
The thick-target model only accounts for Coulomb collisions between the
+
-
propagating beam of accelerated electrons and the background plasma.
+
-
In this Nugget we present simulation results from our recent
+
-
[http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0314 paper], where
+
-
we show what happens to the dip when you also include wave-particle
+
-
interactions between the beam and the background plasma.
+
== Wave-particle Interactions ==
== Wave-particle Interactions ==
-
In the standard interpretation of RHESSI's hard X-ray emission, a negative powerlaw of accelerated electrons (F<sub>0</sub>(E) ~E<sup>-δ<sub>0</sub></sup>) above a sharp low energy cutoff leaves the corona travelling down to the chromosphere.  
+
In the standard interpretation of RHESSI's hard X-ray emission, a negative powerlaw of accelerated electrons (F<sub>0</sub>(E) ~E<sup>-δ</sup> for E>E<sub>C</sub>) above a sharp low energy cutoff leaves the corona travelling down to the chromosphere.  
As the electrons propagate they lose energy to the background plasma through Coloumb collisions, eventually stopping in the dense chromosphere, where they emit hard X-rays as observed by RHESSI.
As the electrons propagate they lose energy to the background plasma through Coloumb collisions, eventually stopping in the dense chromosphere, where they emit hard X-rays as observed by RHESSI.
The collisional energy losses also heat the local plasma, which then expands back upwards along the magnetic field.  
The collisional energy losses also heat the local plasma, which then expands back upwards along the magnetic field.  
-
It can be analytically shown the the resulting mean electron flux spectrum <nVF(E)> will also have a negative power law above the cutoff (<nVF>~E<sup>-δ<sub>1</sub></sup>) but will have a positive one (<nVF(E)>~E<sup>δ<sub>1</sub></sup>) at low energies.  
+
It can be analytically shown the the resulting mean electron flux spectrum <nVF(E)> will also have a negative power law above the cutoff (<nVF>~E<sup>-(δ-2)</sup>) but will have a positive one (<nVF(E)>~E) below the cutoff energy.  
-
The background plasma appears to have a thermal (Maxwellian) distribution with a mean energy kT well below the energies of the non-thermal
+
For flares with relatively low thermal emission the total mean electron distribution <nFV> will have a local minimum or "dip" between the thermal component and the positive slope of the low-energy non-thermal electrons.
-
electrons.
+
-
This distribution falls rapidly with energy, and in combination with the positive slope of the low-energy non-thermal electrons results in a local minimum or "dip" in the total mean electron distribution <nVF>.
+
We have simulated the propagation of such a power law of accelerated electrons, with only Coulomb collisions acting on the beam, as shown in the left panel of Figure 1.  
We have simulated the propagation of such a power law of accelerated electrons, with only Coulomb collisions acting on the beam, as shown in the left panel of Figure 1.  
But we have also run a second set of numerical simulations in which we include the wave-particle interactions of the beam electrons and the background plasma.  
But we have also run a second set of numerical simulations in which we include the wave-particle interactions of the beam electrons and the background plasma.  
-
Specifically we include beam-driven [Langmuir wave] [turbulence].  
+
Specifically we include beam-driven [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_oscillation Langmuir wave] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbulence turbulence].  
-
We want to include the wave-particle interactions as this non-collisional process may be faster than the Coulomb collision process.
+
We want to include the wave-particle interactions as this non-collisional process turns out to be faster than the Coulomb collision process.
-
Furthermore the development of Langmuir waves from electron beams in solar flares is inferred from radio observations of [type III bursts].  
+
The development of Langmuir waves from electron beams in the solar atmosphere has long been inferred from radio observations of [http://www.heliotown.com/Radio_Sun_Introduction.html type III bursts], which are often associated with flares.
-
The use the quasi-linear approach describing the resonant interaction between the electrons and Langmuir waves.  
+
The use the weak turbulence approach describing the resonant interaction between the electrons and Langmuir waves.  
We follow in time the variation of the electron distribution function f(v,x,t) and, self-consistently, the spectral energy density of the waves W(v,x,t).  
We follow in time the variation of the electron distribution function f(v,x,t) and, self-consistently, the spectral energy density of the waves W(v,x,t).  
-
In Figure 1 we show snapshots from the simulations showing f(v,x,t) for the Coulomb collision simulation (left) and f(v,x,t) and W(v,x,t) for the wave-particle simulation (middle and right panel).  
+
In Figure 1 we show snapshots from the simulations showing f(v,x,t) for the Coulomb-collision simulation (left) and f(v,x,t) and W(v,x,t) for the wave-particle simulation (middle and right panel).  
A movie of this can also be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO2U7WeHu1Q here].
A movie of this can also be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO2U7WeHu1Q here].
Line 66: Line 53:
[[Image:fig3b.png|frame|center|'''Figure 2:''' The mean electron flux spectrum <nVF> for the simulation with Coulomb collisions actng on the beam only (left) and the inclusion of wave-particle interaction (right). The black line shows the simulation result, the orange dashed line an overplotted thermal model spectrum. The total spectrum is the dashed green line, indicating the presence of a dip in the Coulomb collision only case.]]
[[Image:fig3b.png|frame|center|'''Figure 2:''' The mean electron flux spectrum <nVF> for the simulation with Coulomb collisions actng on the beam only (left) and the inclusion of wave-particle interaction (right). The black line shows the simulation result, the orange dashed line an overplotted thermal model spectrum. The total spectrum is the dashed green line, indicating the presence of a dip in the Coulomb collision only case.]]
-
The positive slope increase in the Coulomb colision only case (left panel Figure 2) is clearly evident in the mean electron spectrum.  
+
The positive slope increase in the Coulomb-collision-only case (left panel Figure 2) is clearly evident in the mean electron spectrum.  
The wave-particle interactions produce an almost flat, though slighlty negative, spectrum at low energies.  
The wave-particle interactions produce an almost flat, though slighlty negative, spectrum at low energies.  
With the inclusion of a thermal model spectrum, and using typical parameters for a small flare, we see the appearance of the local minimum or "dip" in the beam-only case.
With the inclusion of a thermal model spectrum, and using typical parameters for a small flare, we see the appearance of the local minimum or "dip" in the beam-only case.
Line 77: Line 64:
The inclusion of such effects goes beyond the traditional propagation theory, which typically relies on Coulomb scattering alone.
The inclusion of such effects goes beyond the traditional propagation theory, which typically relies on Coulomb scattering alone.
The wave-particle interactions turn out to flatten any sharp low-energy cutoff in the inital accelerated electron distribution.  
The wave-particle interactions turn out to flatten any sharp low-energy cutoff in the inital accelerated electron distribution.  
-
There are still other processes not included here, but this first look strongly suggests that the standard "thick-target" interpretation is insufficient to explain the RHESSI spectral observations.
+
 
 +
There are still other processes not included here, but this first look strongly suggests that the standard "thick-target" interpretation is insufficient to explain the RHESSI spectral observations and questions the suitability of a low-energy cutoff model for fitting RHESSI spectra.
[[category:Nugget]]
[[category:Nugget]]

Latest revision as of 17:48, 18 January 2010


Dips and Waves
Number: 115
1st Author: Iain Hannah
2nd Author: Eduard Kontar
Published: 23 November 2009
Next Nugget: A tiny white-light flare‎
Previous Nugget: STEREO observations of flares and their associations with CMEs
List all



Introduction

Solar flares feature the acceleration of non-thermal particles of several descriptions. One of RHESSI's primary tasks is to study these particles via their bremsstrahlung X-rays. The X-ray spectrum typically follows a power law at high energies "hard X-rays", and an exponential at lower "soft X-ray" energies; in the standard interpretation these components reveal (respectively) the non-thermal energetic particles and hot plasma in the corona. The theory of the nonthermal x-ray radiation involves several processes: the initial acceleration of the particles, their propagation through the solar atmosphere, and their X-ray production as they lose energy to the background plasma. With several assumptions, can be wrapped up into a tractable problem in inverse theory. When this was first done at RHESSI's high spectral resolution, a new and unexpected feature tended to appear: a dip in the spectrum at about 30 keV.

There has been some heated discussion (for instance in this earlier Nugget) as to whether this "dip" seen in the mean electron spectrum derived from RHESSI X-ray observations is a real feature. It can often be removed by correcting for the albedo flux of X-rays scattered back to the observer from the solar atmosphere beneath the source. But for flares with relatively low thermal mission, the standard thick-target interpretation says that for an accelerated population of electrons above a low-energy cutoff the dip must be there. The thick-target model only accounts for Coulomb collisions between the propagating beam of accelerated electrons and the background plasma. In this Nugget we present simulation results from our recent paper, where we show what happens to the dip when you also include wave-particle interactions between the beam and the background plasma.

Wave-particle Interactions

In the standard interpretation of RHESSI's hard X-ray emission, a negative powerlaw of accelerated electrons (F0(E) ~E for E>EC) above a sharp low energy cutoff leaves the corona travelling down to the chromosphere. As the electrons propagate they lose energy to the background plasma through Coloumb collisions, eventually stopping in the dense chromosphere, where they emit hard X-rays as observed by RHESSI. The collisional energy losses also heat the local plasma, which then expands back upwards along the magnetic field. It can be analytically shown the the resulting mean electron flux spectrum <nVF(E)> will also have a negative power law above the cutoff (<nVF>~E-(δ-2)) but will have a positive one (<nVF(E)>~E) below the cutoff energy. For flares with relatively low thermal emission the total mean electron distribution <nFV> will have a local minimum or "dip" between the thermal component and the positive slope of the low-energy non-thermal electrons.

We have simulated the propagation of such a power law of accelerated electrons, with only Coulomb collisions acting on the beam, as shown in the left panel of Figure 1. But we have also run a second set of numerical simulations in which we include the wave-particle interactions of the beam electrons and the background plasma. Specifically we include beam-driven Langmuir wave turbulence. We want to include the wave-particle interactions as this non-collisional process turns out to be faster than the Coulomb collision process. The development of Langmuir waves from electron beams in the solar atmosphere has long been inferred from radio observations of type III bursts, which are often associated with flares.

The use the weak turbulence approach describing the resonant interaction between the electrons and Langmuir waves. We follow in time the variation of the electron distribution function f(v,x,t) and, self-consistently, the spectral energy density of the waves W(v,x,t). In Figure 1 we show snapshots from the simulations showing f(v,x,t) for the Coulomb-collision simulation (left) and f(v,x,t) and W(v,x,t) for the wave-particle simulation (middle and right panel). A movie of this can also be found here.

Figure 1: The electron distribution f and energy density of the waves W showing the simulation results from the 2 different simulations: Coulomb collisions only on the left; wave-particle interactions on the right.) A movie of this can be found here

The immediate thing that happens is that the wave-particles very quickly flatten the low energy cutoff, producing a plateau in the electron distribution at low energies or velocities. The Coulomb collision alone are far slower at removing the low energy cutoff and produce the expected positive gradient in the electron distribution below the cutoff energy. To calculate the mean electron flux spectrum from our simulations we use the simulated f(v,x,t)/m, spatially integrating and averaging over time. The resulting spectra are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The mean electron flux spectrum <nVF> for the simulation with Coulomb collisions actng on the beam only (left) and the inclusion of wave-particle interaction (right). The black line shows the simulation result, the orange dashed line an overplotted thermal model spectrum. The total spectrum is the dashed green line, indicating the presence of a dip in the Coulomb collision only case.

The positive slope increase in the Coulomb-collision-only case (left panel Figure 2) is clearly evident in the mean electron spectrum. The wave-particle interactions produce an almost flat, though slighlty negative, spectrum at low energies. With the inclusion of a thermal model spectrum, and using typical parameters for a small flare, we see the appearance of the local minimum or "dip" in the beam-only case. In the beam-and-waves case there is always a negative gradient.

Conclusions

The work shown here is a step towards a more complete treatment of electron transport in solar flares by consideration of wave-particle interactions. The inclusion of such effects goes beyond the traditional propagation theory, which typically relies on Coulomb scattering alone. The wave-particle interactions turn out to flatten any sharp low-energy cutoff in the inital accelerated electron distribution.

There are still other processes not included here, but this first look strongly suggests that the standard "thick-target" interpretation is insufficient to explain the RHESSI spectral observations and questions the suitability of a low-energy cutoff model for fitting RHESSI spectra.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox