Dips and Waves

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Revised conclusions)
(typos and grammar rectification - still need to add links)
Line 39: Line 39:
== Wave-particle Interactions ==
== Wave-particle Interactions ==
-
In the standard interpretation of RHESSI's hard X-ray emission, a negative powerlaw of acceelerated electrons (F<sub>0</sub>(E) ~E<sup>-δ<sub>0</sub></sup>) above a sharp low energy cutoff leaves the corona travelling down to the chromosphere. As they propagate they lose energy to the background plasma through Coloumb collisions, eventually losing their energy in the dense chromosphere, where they emit hard X-rays as observed by RHESSI, heating the local plasma which expands back upwards. It can be analytically shown the the resulting mean electron flux spectrum <nVF(E)> will also have a neagtive powerlaw above the cutoff (<nVF>~E<sup>-δ<sub>1</sub></sup>) but will have a positive one (<nVF(E)>~E<sup>δ<sub>1</sub></sup>) below the cutoff. The combination of this positive slope (increasing with increasing energy) and the falling thermal spectrum results in a local minima or "dip" in the total <nVF>.
+
In the standard interpretation of RHESSI's hard X-ray emission, a negative powerlaw of accelerated electrons (F<sub>0</sub>(E) ~E<sup>-δ<sub>0</sub></sup>) above a sharp low energy cutoff leaves the corona travelling down to the chromosphere.  
 +
As the electrons propagate they lose energy to the background plasma through Coloumb collisions, eventually stopping in the dense chromosphere, where they emit hard X-rays as observed by RHESSI.
 +
The collisional energy losses also heat the local plasma, which then expands back upwards along the magnetic field.  
 +
It can be analytically shown the the resulting mean electron flux spectrum <nVF(E)> will also have a negative power law above the cutoff (<nVF>~E<sup>-δ<sub>1</sub></sup>) but will have a positive one (<nVF(E)>~E<sup>δ<sub>1</sub></sup>) at low energies.  
 +
The background plasma appears to have a thermal (Maxwellian) distribution with a mean energy kT well below the energies of the non-thermal
 +
electrons.
 +
This distribution falls rapidly  with energy, and in combination with the positive slope of the low-energy non-thermal electrons results in a local minimum or "dip" in the total mean electron distribution <nVF>.
-
We have simulated the propagation of such a powerlaw of acceleration electrons, Coulomb colision acting on the beam only, as shown in the left panel of Figure 1. But we have also ran a second set of numerical simulations in which we include the wave-particle interaction of the beam and background plasma. Namely we include beam-driven Langmuir wave turbulence. We want to include the waves-particle interactions as this non-collisional process is faster than collisions and the development of Langmuir waves from electron beams in solar flares is inferred from radio observations. These are self-consitently simulated using the quasi-linear approach describing the resonant interaction between the electrons and Langmuir waves. In these simulations we follow through time the electron distribution function f(v,x,t) and spectral energy density of the waves W(v,x,t). In Figure 1 we have snapshot from during the simulations showing f(v,x,t) for the coulomb collision only simulation (left) and f(v,x,t) and W(v,x,t) for the wave-particle simulation (middle and right panel). A movie of this can also be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO2U7WeHu1Q here].
+
We have simulated the propagation of such a power law of accelerated electrons, with only Coulomb collisions acting on the beam, as shown in the left panel of Figure 1.  
 +
But we have also run a second set of numerical simulations in which we include the wave-particle interactions of the beam electrons and the background plasma.  
 +
Specifically we include beam-driven [Langmuir wave] [turbulence].  
 +
We want to include the wave-particle interactions as this non-collisional process may be faster than the Coulomb collision process.
 +
Furthermore the development of Langmuir waves from electron beams in solar flares is inferred from radio observations of [type III bursts].  
-
[[Image:Fwc_10009.jpg|frame|center|'''Figure 1:''' The electron distribution f and energy density of the waves W showing the simulation results from the 2 different simulations: Coulomb collisions only on the left, including wave-particle interactions on the right.) A movie of this can be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO2U7WeHu1Q here]]]
+
The use the quasi-linear approach describing the resonant interaction between the electrons and Langmuir waves.
 +
We follow in time the variation of the electron distribution function f(v,x,t) and, self-consistently, the spectral energy density of the waves W(v,x,t).
 +
In Figure 1 we show snapshots from the simulations showing f(v,x,t) for the Coulomb collision simulation (left) and f(v,x,t) and W(v,x,t) for the wave-particle simulation (middle and right panel).
 +
A movie of this can also be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO2U7WeHu1Q here].
-
The immediate thing that happens is that the wave-particles very quickly flatten the low energy cutoff, producing a plateau in the electron distribution at low energies or velocities. The Coulomb collision alone are far slower at removing the low energy cutoff and produce the expected positive gradient in the electron distribution below the cutoff energy. To calculate the mean electron flux spectrum from our simulations we use the simulated f(v,x,t)/m, spatially integrating and averaging over time. The resulting spectra are shown in Figure 2.
+
[[Image:Fwc_10009.jpg|frame|center|'''Figure 1:''' The electron distribution f and energy density of the waves W showing the simulation results from the 2 different simulations: Coulomb collisions only on the left; wave-particle interactions on the right.) A movie of this can be found [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO2U7WeHu1Q here]]]
-
[[Image:fig3b.png|frame|center|'''Figure 2:''' The mean electron flux spectrum <nVF> for the simulation with Coulomb collisions actng on the beam only (left) and the inclusion of wave-particle interaction (right). The black line shows the simulation result, the orange dashed line an overplotted thermal model spectrum. The total spectrum is the dashed green line, indicating the presence of a dip in the Coulomb collision only case.]]
+
The immediate thing that happens is that the wave-particles very quickly flatten the low energy cutoff, producing a plateau in the electron distribution at low energies or velocities.  
 +
The Coulomb collision alone are far slower at removing the low energy cutoff and produce the expected positive gradient in the electron distribution below the cutoff energy.
 +
To calculate the mean electron flux spectrum from our simulations we use the simulated f(v,x,t)/m, spatially integrating and averaging over time. The resulting spectra are shown in Figure 2.
-
The positive slope increase in the Coulomb colision only case (left panel Figure 2) is clearly evident in the mean electron spectrum. As is the almost flat, though slighlty negative, spectrum at low energies when the wave-particle interactions are also considered. With the inclusion of a thermal model spectrum, using typical parameters for a small flare, we see the apearance of the local minima or "dip" in the beam only case but in the beam and waves case there is always a negative gradient.
+
[[Image:fig3b.png|frame|center|'''Figure 2:''' The mean electron flux spectrum <nVF> for the simulation with Coulomb collisions actng on the beam only (left) and the inclusion of wave-particle interaction (right). The black line shows the simulation result, the orange dashed line an overplotted thermal model spectrum. The total spectrum is the dashed green line, indicating the presence of a dip in the Coulomb collision only case.]]
 +
The positive slope increase in the Coulomb colision only case (left panel Figure 2) is clearly evident in the mean electron spectrum.
 +
The wave-particle interactions produce an almost flat, though slighlty negative, spectrum at low energies.
 +
With the inclusion of a thermal model spectrum, and using typical parameters for a small flare, we see the appearance of the local minimum or "dip" in the beam-only case.
 +
In the beam-and-waves case there is always a negative gradient.
== Conclusions ==
== Conclusions ==

Revision as of 08:29, 23 November 2009


Dips and Waves
Number: 115
1st Author: Iain Hannah
2nd Author:
Published: 23 November 2009
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: STEREO observations of flares and their associations with CMEs
List all



Introduction

Solar flares feature the acceleration of non-thermal particles ofseveral descriptions. One of RHESSI's primary tasks is to study these particles via their [bremsstrahlung] X-rays. The X-ray spectrum typically follows a power law at high energies "hard X-rays", and an exponential at lower "soft X-ray" energies; in the standard interpretation these components reveal (respectively) the primary particle acceleration and its [Maxwellianized] "thermal" heating.The theory of the nonthermal radiation involves several processes: the initial acceleration of the particles, their propagation through the solar atmosphere, and their X-ray production as they lose energy to thebackground plasma.With several assumptions, all of this theory can be wrapped up intoa tractable problem in [inverse theory]. When this was first done at RHESSI's [high spectral resolution], a new and unexpected feature tended to appear: a [dip] in the spectrum at about 30 keV.</p>

There has been some heated discussion (for instance in this earlier Nugget) as to whether this "dip" seen in the mean electron spectrum derived from RHESSI X-ray observations is a real feature. It can often be removed by correcting for the [albedo] flux of X-rays scattered back to the observer from the solar atmosphere beneath the source. But for flares with relatively low thermal mission the standard [thick-target] interpretation says that the dip must be there. The thick-target model only accounts for Coulomb collisions between the propagating beam of accelerated electrons and the background plasma. In this Nugget we present simulation results from our recent paper, where we show what happens to the dip when you also include wave-particle interactions between the beam and the background plasma.

Wave-particle Interactions

In the standard interpretation of RHESSI's hard X-ray emission, a negative powerlaw of accelerated electrons (F0(E) ~E0) above a sharp low energy cutoff leaves the corona travelling down to the chromosphere. As the electrons propagate they lose energy to the background plasma through Coloumb collisions, eventually stopping in the dense chromosphere, where they emit hard X-rays as observed by RHESSI. The collisional energy losses also heat the local plasma, which then expands back upwards along the magnetic field. It can be analytically shown the the resulting mean electron flux spectrum <nVF(E)> will also have a negative power law above the cutoff (<nVF>~E1) but will have a positive one (<nVF(E)>~Eδ1) at low energies. The background plasma appears to have a thermal (Maxwellian) distribution with a mean energy kT well below the energies of the non-thermal electrons. This distribution falls rapidly with energy, and in combination with the positive slope of the low-energy non-thermal electrons results in a local minimum or "dip" in the total mean electron distribution <nVF>.

We have simulated the propagation of such a power law of accelerated electrons, with only Coulomb collisions acting on the beam, as shown in the left panel of Figure 1. But we have also run a second set of numerical simulations in which we include the wave-particle interactions of the beam electrons and the background plasma. Specifically we include beam-driven [Langmuir wave] [turbulence]. We want to include the wave-particle interactions as this non-collisional process may be faster than the Coulomb collision process. Furthermore the development of Langmuir waves from electron beams in solar flares is inferred from radio observations of [type III bursts].

The use the quasi-linear approach describing the resonant interaction between the electrons and Langmuir waves. We follow in time the variation of the electron distribution function f(v,x,t) and, self-consistently, the spectral energy density of the waves W(v,x,t). In Figure 1 we show snapshots from the simulations showing f(v,x,t) for the Coulomb collision simulation (left) and f(v,x,t) and W(v,x,t) for the wave-particle simulation (middle and right panel). A movie of this can also be found here.

Figure 1: The electron distribution f and energy density of the waves W showing the simulation results from the 2 different simulations: Coulomb collisions only on the left; wave-particle interactions on the right.) A movie of this can be found here

The immediate thing that happens is that the wave-particles very quickly flatten the low energy cutoff, producing a plateau in the electron distribution at low energies or velocities. The Coulomb collision alone are far slower at removing the low energy cutoff and produce the expected positive gradient in the electron distribution below the cutoff energy. To calculate the mean electron flux spectrum from our simulations we use the simulated f(v,x,t)/m, spatially integrating and averaging over time. The resulting spectra are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: The mean electron flux spectrum <nVF> for the simulation with Coulomb collisions actng on the beam only (left) and the inclusion of wave-particle interaction (right). The black line shows the simulation result, the orange dashed line an overplotted thermal model spectrum. The total spectrum is the dashed green line, indicating the presence of a dip in the Coulomb collision only case.

The positive slope increase in the Coulomb colision only case (left panel Figure 2) is clearly evident in the mean electron spectrum. The wave-particle interactions produce an almost flat, though slighlty negative, spectrum at low energies. With the inclusion of a thermal model spectrum, and using typical parameters for a small flare, we see the appearance of the local minimum or "dip" in the beam-only case. In the beam-and-waves case there is always a negative gradient.

Conclusions

The work shown here is a step towards a more complete treatment of electron transport in solar flares by consideration of wave-particle interactions. The inclusion of such effects goes beyond the traditional propagation theory, which typically relies on Coulomb scattering alone. The wave-particle interactions turn out to flatten any sharp low-energy cutoff in the inital accelerated electron distribution.

There are still other processes not included here, but this first look strongly suggests that the standard "thick-target" interpretation is insufficient to explain the RHESSI spectral observations.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox