User talk:Jiongqiu

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
Solar flares are characterized by impulsively enhanced emissions most pronounced in hard X-ray and microwave light curves. These light curves in even a simple, single, short-lived flare usually exhibit quite complicated structures consisting of numerous fast-varying bursts,  unlike the rather smooth and gradual soft X-ray emissions. Ground-based and space missions in pre-RHESSI era have revealed  the shortest time scales, from a few seconds to several tens of milli-seconds, of these bursts. A few studies correlating high cadence yet spatially unresolved hard X-ray observations with high cadence high resolution optical observations have further shown that hard X-ray bursts are correlated with optical emission on time scales of about one second, suggesting that these fast-varying bursts are thick-target emissions, and their size is within one arc-second. This is, in general, consistent with recent EUV observations showing that the size of a flare loop is about one arc-second. It may be noted that these quoted values are likely upper bounds of the tempo-spatial scales as limited by the resolving capability of instruments.
Solar flares are characterized by impulsively enhanced emissions most pronounced in hard X-ray and microwave light curves. These light curves in even a simple, single, short-lived flare usually exhibit quite complicated structures consisting of numerous fast-varying bursts,  unlike the rather smooth and gradual soft X-ray emissions. Ground-based and space missions in pre-RHESSI era have revealed  the shortest time scales, from a few seconds to several tens of milli-seconds, of these bursts. A few studies correlating high cadence yet spatially unresolved hard X-ray observations with high cadence high resolution optical observations have further shown that hard X-ray bursts are correlated with optical emission on time scales of about one second, suggesting that these fast-varying bursts are thick-target emissions, and their size is within one arc-second. This is, in general, consistent with recent EUV observations showing that the size of a flare loop is about one arc-second. It may be noted that these quoted values are likely upper bounds of the tempo-spatial scales as limited by the resolving capability of instruments.
-
Today we commonly recognize that a flare is a collection of multiple episodes of energy release on some fundamental scales. For example, the bursts' time scales may depend on the characteristic size of the elementary flux tubes (e.g., Sturrock et al. , 1984; LaRosa & Moore , 1993), or the turbulent dynamics of the reconnecting current sheets (eg., Litvinenko , 1996). As these fast-varying bursts are typically reported in hard X-ray and microwave light curves, the observed time scales are also a product of convolution with timescales of acceleration and transport of non-thermal particles in flare environment.  
+
Today we commonly recognize that a flare is a collection of multiple episodes of energy release on some fundamental scales. For example, the bursts' time scales may depend on the characteristic size of the elementary flux tubes (e.g., Sturrock et al. , 1984; LaRosa & Moore , 1993), or the turbulent dynamics of the reconnecting current sheets (eg., Litvinenko , 1996). As these fast-varying bursts are typically reported in hard X-ray and microwave light curves, the observed time scales are also a product of convolution with timescales of acceleration and transport of non-thermal particles in flare environment. Whereas it is yet difficult to disentangle these different physical mechanisms involved in a single burst, there are basic observational questions to be addressed: what are the temporal, spatial, and spectral properties of these bursts, when compared with the gross properties of a flare?
The Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI Lin et al. , 2002) launched in early 2002 has provided unprecedented advantage to  
The Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI Lin et al. , 2002) launched in early 2002 has provided unprecedented advantage to  
-
uncover the temporal, spectral, and spatial properties of hard X-ray bursts. This nugget studies a sample of hard X-ray flares observed by RHESS in 2002.
+
hopefully answer these questions. This nugget studies a sample of hard X-ray flares observed by RHESS using a demodulation algorithm that
-
 
+
allows analysis of hard X-ray light curves with sub-second time resolution. It should be noted that the study focuses on the most prominent fast-varying
-
The questions raised by these spikes are: are they the fundamental structure of flare energy release? Are flare spectral properties related to their time spatial scales?
+
bursts standing out of, rather than making up, the entire flare emission. We call them "hard X-ray spikes".
-
 
+
-
 
+
==  Temporal and Spectral Properties of Hard X-ray Spikes ==
-
== How Many Hard X-ray Spikes, How fast, How small ==
+
-
 
+
-
Turns out only a small fractions of flares exhibit these spikes that can be detected at up to 100 keV. They have rather symmetric rise and decay; about one third of spikes show high energy emission lagging low energy emission, and the spectrally, the spikes have slightly harder spectrum than underlying component. Therefore, the spikes are a special kind of energetic burst, but not the building blocks of flare emission in general. However, with the present
+
-
 
+
 +
Having searched the entire flare catalog in 2002, it turns out only a small fraction of flares exhibit hard X-ray spikes
 +
that can be detected at up to 100 keV. The spikes usually have symmetric rise and decay, and have durations below one second, which is independent of the photon energy. These results are consistent with the findings by SMM three decades ago.
 +
In terms of the spectral property of the spikes, the spectrum of integrated counts of greater than 20 keV can be fitted to a power-law distribution. Compared with underlying components, spikes have slightly harder spectrum. These are generally recognized signatures of non-thermal emission. A fraction of the spikes also exhibit energy-dependent time lag of either kind: the low-energy emission lagging high-energy emission, usually interpreted as reflecting time-of-flight of direct precipitation electrons, or high-energy emission lagging low-energy emission thought to be indicative of Coulomb collision effects in the trap.
[[Image:129fig1.jpg|center|thumb|800px|Figure 1: Maps of the Bastille Day flare, superposed on an array of positive (P) and negative (N) poles used to characterize the solar magnetic field.  
[[Image:129fig1.jpg|center|thumb|800px|Figure 1: Maps of the Bastille Day flare, superposed on an array of positive (P) and negative (N) poles used to characterize the solar magnetic field.  
Line 33: Line 32:
Note that both emissions tend to have EW elongations lying in opposite polarities.]]
Note that both emissions tend to have EW elongations lying in opposite polarities.]]
-
== Discovery of UV "cooling" ==
+
== Where Are the Spikes? ==
-
Generally, and in this case as well, the hard X-ray and UV emissions have strikingly similar time variations when viewed
+
A few different ways have been attempted to locate  ten spikes out of the studied sample. Direct mapping of the spikes, as confirmed by coordinated UV and optical images whenever available, shows that the spikes at above 25 keVs are most likely thick-target emissions at conjugate foot-points of flare loops, and observed loop length is consistent with estimate from time-of-flight analysis. The spikes are basically inside or very closely attached to the sources of underlying components, indicating that  reconnection and acceleration events that produce hard X-ray spikes take place in the same magnetic environment of the underlying sources.
-
as a whole, but in detail they may not agree.
+
-
The UV emission persists at low levels, filling out the ribbon structures even when the hard X-ray footpoints have disappeared
+
-
or moved elsewhere.
+
-
We have studied the time variation in individual pixels of the TRACE images and find a very suggestive pattern, which we illustrate in
+
-
Figure 2.
+
[[Image:129fig2.jpg|center|thumb|800px|Figure 2: UV time variations in individual pixels.]]
[[Image:129fig2.jpg|center|thumb|800px|Figure 2: UV time variations in individual pixels.]]
-
The individual pixels show a characteristic pattern. At the beginning, there is an impulsive increase; following this, each
+
== Conclusions ==
-
pixel appears to decay exponentially in brightness. We suggest that the UV emission, which rises nearly instantaneously
+
-
with the hard X-rays, is likely produced primarily by non-thermal electron precipitation, and then undergoes an elongated decay well after the decay of hard X-rays. This could be identified with the cooling (or loss of excess energy in the form of gas pressure) of magnetic loops formed as a part of the flare arcade. The tendency for individual loops to have similar decay times would then correspond to the fact that the loops have similar dimensions.
+
-
== Conclusions ==
+
RHESSI capabilities have allowed us to continue the decades-long effort to study rapidly evolving hard X-ray bursts. These observations may hold the key to uncover fundamental scales of energy release in solar flares. The most prominent hard X-ray spikes from a sample of RHESSI flares exhibit similar temporal properties as those discovered in SMM flares in the 70s. The additional advantage of RHESSI spectral and imaging capability, combined with other imaging instruments, further
-
The revisit raises some interesting questions. First, obviously, the evolution and mapping of UV and hard X-ray
+
Given their generally harder spectrum, hard X-ray spikes are the most energetic population of elementary bursts. For the ten samples that have been mapped, they are almost certainly thick-target emissions, mostly from double foot-points of flare loops. They are produced in nearly the same location and magnetic environment as the less impulsive and less energetic bursts in the neighborhood. Should this mean that a peculiar dynamic perturbation in the same macroscopic current sheet which is the master board of clusters of  energy release events? Are we at the position to directly associate the observed scales with a "fundamental" scale of flare, and what does this "fundamental" scale mean?
-
sources reflect the pattern of magnetic reconnection which is not entirely 2-dimensional, and second,
+
-
the coincident rise and peak but delayed decay in UV emission with respect to hard X-ray emission
+
-
suggests some different physics, not directly related to hard X-ray producing process, taking
+
-
place during the gradual decay of UV emission.
+
-
We think that an individual point in the ribbon stays bright, even after its initial excitation (identified with the
+
-
hard X-ray footpoint) has faded away.
+
-
The persistence of this UV brightness allows the ribbons to have a larger extent than the footpoints, and to follow
+
-
a different pattern of evolution.
+
==Acknowledgements ==
==Acknowledgements ==

Revision as of 20:17, 29 December 2012


Nugget
Number:  ???
1st Author: Jiong Qiu
2nd Author:
Published: 2013 January
Next Nugget: Albedo and the modification of RHESSI results
Previous Nugget: Awesome Stellar Flare Spectra
List all



Contents

Introduction

Solar flares are characterized by impulsively enhanced emissions most pronounced in hard X-ray and microwave light curves. These light curves in even a simple, single, short-lived flare usually exhibit quite complicated structures consisting of numerous fast-varying bursts, unlike the rather smooth and gradual soft X-ray emissions. Ground-based and space missions in pre-RHESSI era have revealed the shortest time scales, from a few seconds to several tens of milli-seconds, of these bursts. A few studies correlating high cadence yet spatially unresolved hard X-ray observations with high cadence high resolution optical observations have further shown that hard X-ray bursts are correlated with optical emission on time scales of about one second, suggesting that these fast-varying bursts are thick-target emissions, and their size is within one arc-second. This is, in general, consistent with recent EUV observations showing that the size of a flare loop is about one arc-second. It may be noted that these quoted values are likely upper bounds of the tempo-spatial scales as limited by the resolving capability of instruments.

Today we commonly recognize that a flare is a collection of multiple episodes of energy release on some fundamental scales. For example, the bursts' time scales may depend on the characteristic size of the elementary flux tubes (e.g., Sturrock et al. , 1984; LaRosa & Moore , 1993), or the turbulent dynamics of the reconnecting current sheets (eg., Litvinenko , 1996). As these fast-varying bursts are typically reported in hard X-ray and microwave light curves, the observed time scales are also a product of convolution with timescales of acceleration and transport of non-thermal particles in flare environment. Whereas it is yet difficult to disentangle these different physical mechanisms involved in a single burst, there are basic observational questions to be addressed: what are the temporal, spatial, and spectral properties of these bursts, when compared with the gross properties of a flare?

The Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI Lin et al. , 2002) launched in early 2002 has provided unprecedented advantage to hopefully answer these questions. This nugget studies a sample of hard X-ray flares observed by RHESS using a demodulation algorithm that allows analysis of hard X-ray light curves with sub-second time resolution. It should be noted that the study focuses on the most prominent fast-varying bursts standing out of, rather than making up, the entire flare emission. We call them "hard X-ray spikes".

Temporal and Spectral Properties of Hard X-ray Spikes

Having searched the entire flare catalog in 2002, it turns out only a small fraction of flares exhibit hard X-ray spikes that can be detected at up to 100 keV. The spikes usually have symmetric rise and decay, and have durations below one second, which is independent of the photon energy. These results are consistent with the findings by SMM three decades ago.

In terms of the spectral property of the spikes, the spectrum of integrated counts of greater than 20 keV can be fitted to a power-law distribution. Compared with underlying components, spikes have slightly harder spectrum. These are generally recognized signatures of non-thermal emission. A fraction of the spikes also exhibit energy-dependent time lag of either kind: the low-energy emission lagging high-energy emission, usually interpreted as reflecting time-of-flight of direct precipitation electrons, or high-energy emission lagging low-energy emission thought to be indicative of Coulomb collision effects in the trap.

Figure 1: Maps of the Bastille Day flare, superposed on an array of positive (P) and negative (N) poles used to characterize the solar magnetic field. Left: hard X-rays; right: UV ribbons time-coded according to the bar at the bottom. Note that both emissions tend to have EW elongations lying in opposite polarities.

Where Are the Spikes?

A few different ways have been attempted to locate ten spikes out of the studied sample. Direct mapping of the spikes, as confirmed by coordinated UV and optical images whenever available, shows that the spikes at above 25 keVs are most likely thick-target emissions at conjugate foot-points of flare loops, and observed loop length is consistent with estimate from time-of-flight analysis. The spikes are basically inside or very closely attached to the sources of underlying components, indicating that reconnection and acceleration events that produce hard X-ray spikes take place in the same magnetic environment of the underlying sources.

Figure 2: UV time variations in individual pixels.

Conclusions

RHESSI capabilities have allowed us to continue the decades-long effort to study rapidly evolving hard X-ray bursts. These observations may hold the key to uncover fundamental scales of energy release in solar flares. The most prominent hard X-ray spikes from a sample of RHESSI flares exhibit similar temporal properties as those discovered in SMM flares in the 70s. The additional advantage of RHESSI spectral and imaging capability, combined with other imaging instruments, further

Given their generally harder spectrum, hard X-ray spikes are the most energetic population of elementary bursts. For the ten samples that have been mapped, they are almost certainly thick-target emissions, mostly from double foot-points of flare loops. They are produced in nearly the same location and magnetic environment as the less impulsive and less energetic bursts in the neighborhood. Should this mean that a peculiar dynamic perturbation in the same macroscopic current sheet which is the master board of clusters of energy release events? Are we at the position to directly associate the observed scales with a "fundamental" scale of flare, and what does this "fundamental" scale mean?


Acknowledgements

This Nugget is based on a presentation at the recent Solar Physics Division meeting by the author with Wenjuan Liu, Nicholas Hill, and Maria Kazachenko.

[Category: Nugget]]

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox