Detector 4 anneal 2012
From RHESSI Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
NicoleDuncan (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | * 2012-12-12 | ||
| + | D4 has been spontaneously segmenting and desegmenting for approximately the past 30 days, it began on day 317. The high voltage was raised by 5 steps to stabilize the segmentation, and it appears to be initially successful. Brian Dennis made some plots to show that its resolution is as good as before the anneal. He also showed that the calibration used in SSW is not up to date. | ||
| + | |||
* Detector 4 has been unsegmented since the 2012 anneal. The entire detector volume is read out through the front segment electronics, so rates look higher for G4 (and also G2) than for the other detectors. | * Detector 4 has been unsegmented since the 2012 anneal. The entire detector volume is read out through the front segment electronics, so rates look higher for G4 (and also G2) than for the other detectors. | ||
Revision as of 22:37, 12 December 2012
- 2012-12-12
D4 has been spontaneously segmenting and desegmenting for approximately the past 30 days, it began on day 317. The high voltage was raised by 5 steps to stabilize the segmentation, and it appears to be initially successful. Brian Dennis made some plots to show that its resolution is as good as before the anneal. He also showed that the calibration used in SSW is not up to date.
- Detector 4 has been unsegmented since the 2012 anneal. The entire detector volume is read out through the front segment electronics, so rates look higher for G4 (and also G2) than for the other detectors.
- 6 November 2012: The front fast and slow thresholds on detector 4 were optimized during 2 passes. The front slow threshold was reduced significantly, down to the nominal value used by segmented detectors, without seeing a large increase in noise. The front fast threshold was lowered a little as well, but not by nearly as much.
G4 Front Slow 0x70 to 0x0C.
G4 Front Fast 0x60 to 0x50.
