A tiny white-light flare

From RHESSI Wiki

Revision as of 01:35, 7 December 2009 by Hhudson (Talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


A Tiny White-Light Flare
Number: 116
1st Author: Hugh Hudson
2nd Author:
Published: 7 December 2009
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: Dips and Waves
List all



Contents

Introduction

We are accustomed to thinking of white-light flares - those detectable to the (protected) naked eye - as the most spectacularly energetic of all flares. That is how [Carrington] discovered flares in 1859, after all. It is generally true that a flare has to be energetic on the scale of Carrington's original one for naked-eye detection, but with sensitive instrumentation one can readily detect weaker events. This Nugget describes a flare at GOES class C6.2 - weak - that produced a clearly detectable signature in the [TRACE] white-light channel, as well as in one each of its UV and an EUV channels. This combination of observations lets us describe the broad-band continuum spectrum, or the [spectral energy distribution] as the astronomers quaintly refer to it.

The flare

The event was weak, but was from the same active region that later produced the Halloween flares, so it was noteworthy in that respect. Although it was weak in soft X-rays, the most common index defining the energy of a flare, it was relative bright in microwaves (360 SFU at 15.4 GHz, according to the [RSTN] network); one SFU is a unit of spectral energy flux: 10-22 W/m2Hz. One will get an idea of how sensitive these radio observations are by thinking about this number in the context of, say, room illumination via a 100-W light bulb.

Figure 1:The TRACE white-light exposure at the impulsive phase of the C6.2 flare of October 20, 2003. The left panel shows X and Y cuts through the brightest point of the image (right), which is in a reversed color table.

Figure 1 shows a white-light image from [TRACE] at the peak of the flare. It is not very impressive, so the line plots at the left are there to give a feeling for how clear the detection really is. One sees a lot of noise in this difference image, but a clear black blob (reversed color table) with a significance of more than 10 [sigma]. The UV and EUV data are much clearer, because the [solar photosphere] is so much fainter at those short wavelengths.


Spectral Energy Distribution

Conclusions

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox