BARREL Balloon Observations and History

From RHESSI Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(revisions)
(updated to correct some of the BARREL specific stuff.)
Line 4: Line 4:
|first_author = Greg Bowers
|first_author = Greg Bowers
|second_author = Alexa Halford
|second_author = Alexa Halford
 +
|third_author = Sara McGregor
|publish_date = February 17, 2014
|publish_date = February 17, 2014
|previous_nugget = [[Instantaneous Flare Properties]]
|previous_nugget = [[Instantaneous Flare Properties]]
Line 39: Line 40:
of Dartmouth College is the lead scientist of this ambitious experiment.
of Dartmouth College is the lead scientist of this ambitious experiment.
As with the original Peterson-Winckler experiment, BARREL wasn't designed
As with the original Peterson-Winckler experiment, BARREL wasn't designed
-
to study solar flares, but their signals come through loud and clear
+
to study solar active regions, but some of their signals come through loud and clear.
-
anyway.
+
BARREL's instrumentation allows it to study the precipitation of  
BARREL's instrumentation allows it to study the precipitation of  
relativistic electrons from the Earth's  
relativistic electrons from the Earth's  
-
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt Van Allen Belts],
+
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt Van Allen Belts].
-
which indeed may share some kinds of
+
-
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrophysical_plasma plasma physics]
+
-
with what happens in a
+
-
[http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Solar_activity solar flare].
+
== How BARREL Works ==
== How BARREL Works ==
Line 54: Line 50:
the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_vortex vortex winds]  
the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_vortex vortex winds]  
at high altitudes in the polar regions.
at high altitudes in the polar regions.
-
At any one time several balloons can fly simultaneously, strung out around
+
At any one time an array of 1 - 8 balloons float around
-
the Antarctic according to their time of launch.
+
the Antarctic. Power comes from solar cells, and data is retrieved over the iridium satellite network to an automated real-time webpage,
-
Power comes from solar cells, and full-time communication via the Iridium
+
allowing the ground-based scientists to follow along. Multi-point measurements allow us to better determine temporal and spatial structures in the radiation belts.
-
satellite network and an automated connection to a real-time webpage,
+
-
allowing the ground-based scientists to follow along.
+
-
For radiation-belt studies, multi-point measurements mean much better
+
-
science.
+
A rather fine  
A rather fine  
[http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/nasa-funded-science-balloons-launch-in-antarctica/#.UwJH_yj5Q-Y video]
[http://www.nasa.gov/content/goddard/nasa-funded-science-balloons-launch-in-antarctica/#.UwJH_yj5Q-Y video]
describes the basic program better than we can here.
describes the basic program better than we can here.
-
We do show a pretty picture here in Figure 1, though, taken at the launch of a BARREL
+
We do show a pretty picture in Figure 1, though, taken at the launch of a BARREL
balloon from the South African Antarctic station  
balloon from the South African Antarctic station  
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SANAE_IV SANAE].
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SANAE_IV SANAE].
Line 73: Line 65:
it is just after launch; the red parachute, furled, and the payload itself.
it is just after launch; the red parachute, furled, and the payload itself.
The payload itself weighs only about 20 kg, and is whisked eventually
The payload itself weighs only about 20 kg, and is whisked eventually
-
up to 30-35 km, well above 99% of the Earth's atmosphere.
+
up to 30-35 km.
The balloon can maintain this altitude for the time it takes to  
The balloon can maintain this altitude for the time it takes to  
circumnavigate the globe, albeit at very  
circumnavigate the globe, albeit at very  
Line 87: Line 79:
the upper atmosphere.
the upper atmosphere.
The time variations reveal the presence of interesting phenomena, and the
The time variations reveal the presence of interesting phenomena, and the
-
detector records their spectra over a wide energy range  
+
detector records their spectra over a wide energy range.
The solar gamma-rays and hard X-rays result from similar physics, but
The solar gamma-rays and hard X-rays result from similar physics, but
with the collisions taking place in the solar atmosphere instead of the Earth's.
with the collisions taking place in the solar atmosphere instead of the Earth's.
Line 93: Line 85:
== BARREL Solar Observations ==
== BARREL Solar Observations ==
-
The BARREL detectors respond to many things, since they are above the
+
The BARREL detectors respond to many things.
-
atmosphere.
+
The full list would include many sources of cosmic X-rays, the Sun as we show in this nugget, the Van Allen Belts by design, and radiation from
-
The full list would include many sources of cosmic X-rays, the Sun as
+
-
illustrated here, the Van Allen Belts by design, and radiation from
+
the Earth's atmosphere.
the Earth's atmosphere.
-
For each of these components, the others would be termed "background
+
For each of these components, the others would often be termed "background
-
radiation" and just reduce the quality of the observation - but that is
+
radiation". When studying one of these events, the others reduce the quality of the observation. However, these other events can sometimes help with  the calibration of our data. for instance, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annihilation_radiation annihilation line] in the atmosphere is used to help calibrate the energy of the events we look at and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma-ray_burst Gamma Ray Bursts] have been found to be useful in making sure the timing of our events is correct between payloads. Some times these other sources are useful and sometimes not, but that is
-
how astrophysics usually works!
+
how science usually works!
-
Figure 2 shows the BARREL responses to the modest M-class flare  
+
Figure 2 shows the BARREL responses to the active region on the Sun which included an M-Class flare  
-
SOL2014-02-07T10:29.
+
SOL2014-02-07T10:29 as well as radio bursts.
-
Note that BARREL payload "2O" missed out, but note also (the lower left
+
Note that BARREL payload "2O" missed out, (the lower left
-
panels) that it was at low altitude.
+
panels). It was at a lower altitude which may have resulted in severe extinction of the incident solar radiation,
-
This results in severe extinction of the incident solar radiation,
+
especially since the Sun is low on the horizon even at high noon at
especially since the Sun is low on the horizon even at high noon at
-
such latitudes - if up at all.
+
such latitudes.
[[File:219f2.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig. 2:  
[[File:219f2.png|800px|thumb|center|Fig. 2:  
Line 117: Line 106:
BARREL balloons flying on 7 February; and their heights and local
BARREL balloons flying on 7 February; and their heights and local
times (longitudes).
times (longitudes).
-
On the right is the clear response two of them gave to the modest flare at  
+
On the right is the clear response two of them gave to the solar active region at  
10:28 UT.
10:28 UT.
]]
]]
-
The solar observations we show are only of academic interest, since not only RHESSI
+
Both RHESSI and [http://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/fermi_solar/ Fermi]
-
but also
+
routinely produce comparable or better data for solar active regions such as these. However, as the BARREL balloons are always up, and for the majority of January are completely sun-lit, the balloons do not go into eclipse. Thus this small balloon mission may be able to help add data to the study of these solar active regions.  
-
[http://hesperia.gsfc.nasa.gov/fermi_solar/ Fermi]
+
-
routinely produce comparable or better data for flares such as these.
+
-
If a remarkable event such as the Peterson-Winckler event [Ref. 1] should
+
-
be found in the accumulated BARREL database it could be
+
-
a different matter.
+
== Conclusions ==
== Conclusions ==
Line 134: Line 118:
(soft X-rays, hard X-rays, gamma rays,  
(soft X-rays, hard X-rays, gamma rays,  
[http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/sep.html "solar cosmic rays"]),  
[http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/sep.html "solar cosmic rays"]),  
-
where many interesting properties of solar flares at high energies
+
where many interesting properties of solar active regions at high energies
-
were first discovered a half-century ago, mainly by Winckler and his group.
+
were first discovered a half-century ago, by Winckler and his group.
== References ==
== References ==

Revision as of 15:33, 19 February 2014


Nugget
Number: 219
1st Author: Greg Bowers
2nd Author: Alexa Halford
Published: February 17, 2014
Next Nugget: TBD
Previous Nugget: Instantaneous Flare Properties
List all



Contents

Introduction

Solar hard X-rays and gamma-rays were discovered in the middle of the last century via balloon-borne instruments [Ref. 1] deployed by the Minnesota physicists L.E. Peterson and J.R. Winckler; the latter also discovered sprites. By modern naming convention, we'd call their flare SOL1958-03-20T13:05, but it preceded any useful soft X-ray observations and so there is no GOES classification of the event. Peterson & Winckler do report the simultaneous occurrence of a "magnetic crotchet," as also detected in the case of the Carrington flare in 1859. Such a geomagnetic effect clearly indicates the presence of strong solar soft X-ray emission along with the high-energy radiations discovered from the balloon.

In this Nugget we report recent balloon-borne observations from multiple balloons of the BARREL expedition to the Antarctic. Robyn MIllan of Dartmouth College is the lead scientist of this ambitious experiment. As with the original Peterson-Winckler experiment, BARREL wasn't designed to study solar active regions, but some of their signals come through loud and clear. BARREL's instrumentation allows it to study the precipitation of relativistic electrons from the Earth's Van Allen Belts.

How BARREL Works

A stream of small balloons circles the Antarctic continent, following the vortex winds at high altitudes in the polar regions. At any one time an array of 1 - 8 balloons float around the Antarctic. Power comes from solar cells, and data is retrieved over the iridium satellite network to an automated real-time webpage, allowing the ground-based scientists to follow along. Multi-point measurements allow us to better determine temporal and spatial structures in the radiation belts. A rather fine video describes the basic program better than we can here. We do show a pretty picture in Figure 1, though, taken at the launch of a BARREL balloon from the South African Antarctic station SANAE.

Fig. 1: A BARREL balloon shortly after launch (view from below). One can see the balloon billowing out, still far from inflated since it is just after launch; the red parachute, furled, and the payload itself. The payload itself weighs only about 20 kg, and is whisked eventually up to 30-35 km. The balloon can maintain this altitude for the time it takes to circumnavigate the globe, albeit at very high latitude.

The instrumentation on each BARREL payload consists of a simple isotropically sensitive sodium iodide scintillation counter. This responds well to the gamma-rays and hard X-rays resulting from bremsstrahlung as the expected relativistic electrons undergo atomic collisions in the upper atmosphere. The time variations reveal the presence of interesting phenomena, and the detector records their spectra over a wide energy range. The solar gamma-rays and hard X-rays result from similar physics, but with the collisions taking place in the solar atmosphere instead of the Earth's.

BARREL Solar Observations

The BARREL detectors respond to many things. The full list would include many sources of cosmic X-rays, the Sun as we show in this nugget, the Van Allen Belts by design, and radiation from the Earth's atmosphere. For each of these components, the others would often be termed "background radiation". When studying one of these events, the others reduce the quality of the observation. However, these other events can sometimes help with the calibration of our data. for instance, the annihilation line in the atmosphere is used to help calibrate the energy of the events we look at and Gamma Ray Bursts have been found to be useful in making sure the timing of our events is correct between payloads. Some times these other sources are useful and sometimes not, but that is how science usually works!

Figure 2 shows the BARREL responses to the active region on the Sun which included an M-Class flare SOL2014-02-07T10:29 as well as radio bursts. Note that BARREL payload "2O" missed out, (the lower left panels). It was at a lower altitude which may have resulted in severe extinction of the incident solar radiation, especially since the Sun is low on the horizon even at high noon at such latitudes.

Fig. 2: A large complicated figure! The panels on the left show, top to bottom, the GOES soft X-ray fluxes (flares); three sets of counting rates from different BARREL balloons flying on 7 February; and their heights and local times (longitudes). On the right is the clear response two of them gave to the solar active region at 10:28 UT.

Both RHESSI and Fermi routinely produce comparable or better data for solar active regions such as these. However, as the BARREL balloons are always up, and for the majority of January are completely sun-lit, the balloons do not go into eclipse. Thus this small balloon mission may be able to help add data to the study of these solar active regions.

Conclusions

BARREL reminds us of the origins of solar high-energy astrophysics (soft X-rays, hard X-rays, gamma rays, "solar cosmic rays"), where many interesting properties of solar active regions at high energies were first discovered a half-century ago, by Winckler and his group.

References

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox